mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Matteo Franchin <Matteo.Franchin@arm.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: Ensure get_futex_key_refs() always implies a barrier
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 00:33:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1413617580.29249.9.camel@linux-t7sj.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413563929-2664-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com>

On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 17:38 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Commit b0c29f79ecea (futexes: Avoid taking the hb->lock if there's
> nothing to wake up) changes the futex code to avoid taking a lock when
> there are no waiters. This code has been subsequently fixed in commit
> 11d4616bd07f (futex: revert back to the explicit waiter counting code).
> Both the original commit and the fix-up rely on get_futex_key_refs() to
> always imply a barrier.
> 
> However, for private futexes, none of the cases in the switch statement
> of get_futex_key_refs() would be hit and the function completes without
> a memory barrier as required before checking the "waiters" in
> futex_wake() -> hb_waiters_pending(). 

Good catch, glad I ran into this thread (my email recently changed).
Private process futex (PTHREAD_PROCESS_PRIVATE) have no reference on an
inode or mm so it would need the explicit barrier in those cases.

> The consequence is a race with a
> thread waiting on a futex on another CPU, allowing the waker thread to
> read "waiters == 0" while the waiter thread to have read "futex_val ==
> locked" (in kernel).

Yeah missing wakeups are a strong sign of a problem with the
hb_waiters_pending() side.

> Without this fix, the problem (user space deadlocks) can be seen with
> Android bionic's mutex implementation on an arm64 multi-cluster system.
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Reported-by: Matteo Franchin <Matteo.Franchin@arm.com>
> Fixes: b0c29f79ecea (futexes: Avoid taking the hb->lock if there's nothing to wake up)
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  kernel/futex.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index 815d7af2ffe8..f3a3a071283c 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -343,6 +343,8 @@ static void get_futex_key_refs(union futex_key *key)
>  	case FUT_OFF_MMSHARED:
>  		futex_get_mm(key); /* implies MB (B) */
>  		break;
> +	default:
> +		smp_mb(); /* explicit MB (B) */
>  	}

Should we comment that this default is for the private futex case?
Otherwise:

Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-18  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-17 16:38 Catalin Marinas
2014-10-18  6:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-10-18  7:09   ` Mike Galbraith
2014-10-18 15:28   ` Linus Torvalds
2014-10-18 16:15     ` Mike Galbraith
2014-10-18  7:33 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2014-10-18 19:58   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-10-18 20:50     ` Linus Torvalds
2014-10-19  2:16       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-10-20  9:11         ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-20 10:49           ` Catalin Marinas
2014-10-20 15:32             ` Linus Torvalds
2014-10-20 16:00               ` Catalin Marinas
2014-10-18 19:32 ` Darren Hart
2014-10-18 20:19   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-10-18 20:25     ` Darren Hart
2014-10-20 10:15     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-10-24  3:27 ` [PATCH] futex: Mention key referencing differences between shared and private futexes Davidlohr Bueso
2014-10-24  9:11   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-10-26 15:22   ` [tip:locking/urgent] " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1413617580.29249.9.camel@linux-t7sj.site \
    --to=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=Matteo.Franchin@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome