From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Matteo Franchin <Matteo.Franchin@arm.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: Ensure get_futex_key_refs() always implies a barrier
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 00:33:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1413617580.29249.9.camel@linux-t7sj.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413563929-2664-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com>
On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 17:38 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Commit b0c29f79ecea (futexes: Avoid taking the hb->lock if there's
> nothing to wake up) changes the futex code to avoid taking a lock when
> there are no waiters. This code has been subsequently fixed in commit
> 11d4616bd07f (futex: revert back to the explicit waiter counting code).
> Both the original commit and the fix-up rely on get_futex_key_refs() to
> always imply a barrier.
>
> However, for private futexes, none of the cases in the switch statement
> of get_futex_key_refs() would be hit and the function completes without
> a memory barrier as required before checking the "waiters" in
> futex_wake() -> hb_waiters_pending().
Good catch, glad I ran into this thread (my email recently changed).
Private process futex (PTHREAD_PROCESS_PRIVATE) have no reference on an
inode or mm so it would need the explicit barrier in those cases.
> The consequence is a race with a
> thread waiting on a futex on another CPU, allowing the waker thread to
> read "waiters == 0" while the waiter thread to have read "futex_val ==
> locked" (in kernel).
Yeah missing wakeups are a strong sign of a problem with the
hb_waiters_pending() side.
> Without this fix, the problem (user space deadlocks) can be seen with
> Android bionic's mutex implementation on an arm64 multi-cluster system.
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Reported-by: Matteo Franchin <Matteo.Franchin@arm.com>
> Fixes: b0c29f79ecea (futexes: Avoid taking the hb->lock if there's nothing to wake up)
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/futex.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index 815d7af2ffe8..f3a3a071283c 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -343,6 +343,8 @@ static void get_futex_key_refs(union futex_key *key)
> case FUT_OFF_MMSHARED:
> futex_get_mm(key); /* implies MB (B) */
> break;
> + default:
> + smp_mb(); /* explicit MB (B) */
> }
Should we comment that this default is for the private futex case?
Otherwise:
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-18 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-17 16:38 Catalin Marinas
2014-10-18 6:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-10-18 7:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-10-18 15:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-10-18 16:15 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-10-18 7:33 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2014-10-18 19:58 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-10-18 20:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-10-19 2:16 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-10-20 9:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-20 10:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-10-20 15:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-10-20 16:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-10-18 19:32 ` Darren Hart
2014-10-18 20:19 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-10-18 20:25 ` Darren Hart
2014-10-20 10:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-10-24 3:27 ` [PATCH] futex: Mention key referencing differences between shared and private futexes Davidlohr Bueso
2014-10-24 9:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-10-26 15:22 ` [tip:locking/urgent] " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1413617580.29249.9.camel@linux-t7sj.site \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=Matteo.Franchin@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome