From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756551AbaJaIkk (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 04:40:40 -0400 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews04.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.7]:51113 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews04.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750912AbaJaIki (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 04:40:38 -0400 Message-ID: <1414744834.1964.7.camel@x220> Subject: iwlwifi: mvm: BACKPORT_WANT_DEV_COREDUMP? From: Paul Bolle To: Johannes Berg Cc: Valentin Rothberg , Emmanuel Grumbach , "John W. Linville" , Intel Linux Wireless , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:40:34 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-4.fc20) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Oct 2014 08:40:35.0564 (UTC) FILETIME=[56F5D2C0:01CFF4E6] X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Your commit aadede6e9f4c ("iwlwifi: mvm: port to devcoredump framework") landed in today's linux-next (next-20141031). It adds a select statement for BACKPORT_WANT_DEV_COREDUMP. There's no Kconfig symbol BACKPORT_WANT_DEV_COREDUMP so this select is currently a nop. (In https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/30/578 I proposed a patch that emits a warning in cases like this.) Did you perhaps meant to select WANT_DEV_COREDUMP? Or is the Kconfig symbol BACKPORT_WANT_DEV_COREDUMP queued somewhere? Paul Bolle