From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390"@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 03/10] mm: replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 13:38:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1416919117-50652-4-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1416919117-50652-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For
example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such
accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145)
Let's change the code to access the page table elements with
READ_ONCE that does implicit scalar accesses.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
mm/gup.c | 2 +-
mm/memory.c | 2 +-
mm/rmap.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index cd62c8c..f2305de 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ static int gup_pud_range(pgd_t *pgdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
pudp = pud_offset(pgdp, addr);
do {
- pud_t pud = ACCESS_ONCE(*pudp);
+ pud_t pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp);
next = pud_addr_end(addr, end);
if (pud_none(pud))
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 3e50383..9e0c84e 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3202,7 +3202,7 @@ static int handle_pte_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
pte_t entry;
spinlock_t *ptl;
- entry = ACCESS_ONCE(*pte);
+ entry = READ_ONCE(*pte);
if (!pte_present(entry)) {
if (pte_none(entry)) {
if (vma->vm_ops) {
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index 19886fb..3152a9c 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ pmd_t *mm_find_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address)
* without holding anon_vma lock for write. So when looking for a
* genuine pmde (in which to find pte), test present and !THP together.
*/
- pmde = ACCESS_ONCE(*pmd);
+ pmde = READ_ONCE(*pmd);
if (!pmd_present(pmde) || pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
pmd = NULL;
out:
--
1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-25 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-25 12:38 [PATCHv2 00/10] ACCESS_ONCE and non-scalar accesses Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-25 12:38 ` [PATCHv2 01/10] KVM: s390: Fix ipte locking Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-25 12:38 ` [PATCHv2 02/10] kernel: Provide READ_ONCE and ASSIGN_ONCE Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-25 15:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-25 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-11-25 17:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-25 19:35 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-25 12:38 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2014-11-25 12:38 ` [PATCHv2 04/10] x86/spinlock: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE/ASSIGN_ONCE Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-25 20:29 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-25 12:38 ` [PATCHv2 05/10] x86: Replace ACCESS_ONCE in gup with READ_ONCE Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-25 12:38 ` [PATCHv2 06/10] mips: " Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-25 12:38 ` [PATCHv2 07/10] arm64: Replace ACCESS_ONCE for spinlock code " Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-25 12:38 ` [PATCHv2 08/10] arm: " Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-25 12:38 ` [PATCHv2 09/10] tighten rules for ACCESS ONCE Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-25 12:38 ` [PATCHv2 10/10] KVM: s390: change ipte lock from barrier to READ_ONCE Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-26 19:20 ` [PATCHv3 00/10] ACCESS_ONCE and non-scalar accesses Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1416919117-50652-4-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc="linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390"@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®