From: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: arm64: lift restriction on last instruction
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 00:38:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1417595881-32218-1-git-send-email-zlim.lnx@gmail.com> (raw)
Earlier implementation assumed last instruction is BPF_EXIT.
Since this is no longer a restriction in eBPF, we remove this
limitation.
Per Alexei Starovoitov [1]:
> classic BPF has a restriction that last insn is always BPF_RET.
> eBPF doesn't have BPF_RET instruction and this restriction.
> It has BPF_EXIT insn which can appear anywhere in the program
> one or more times and it doesn't have to be last insn.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/27/2
Fixes: e54bcde3d69d ("arm64: eBPF JIT compiler")
Signed-off-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
---
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 41f1e3e..edba042 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ struct jit_ctx {
const struct bpf_prog *prog;
int idx;
int tmp_used;
- int body_offset;
+ int epilogue_offset;
int *offset;
u32 *image;
};
@@ -130,8 +130,8 @@ static void jit_fill_hole(void *area, unsigned int size)
static inline int epilogue_offset(const struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
- int to = ctx->offset[ctx->prog->len - 1];
- int from = ctx->idx - ctx->body_offset;
+ int to = ctx->epilogue_offset;
+ int from = ctx->idx;
return to - from;
}
@@ -463,6 +463,8 @@ emit_cond_jmp:
}
/* function return */
case BPF_JMP | BPF_EXIT:
+ /* Optimization: when last instruction is EXIT,
+ simply fallthrough to epilogue. */
if (i == ctx->prog->len - 1)
break;
jmp_offset = epilogue_offset(ctx);
@@ -685,11 +687,13 @@ void bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
/* 1. Initial fake pass to compute ctx->idx. */
- /* Fake pass to fill in ctx->offset. */
+ /* Fake pass to fill in ctx->offset and ctx->tmp_used. */
if (build_body(&ctx))
goto out;
build_prologue(&ctx);
+
+ ctx.epilogue_offset = ctx.idx;
build_epilogue(&ctx);
/* Now we know the actual image size. */
@@ -706,7 +710,6 @@ void bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
build_prologue(&ctx);
- ctx.body_offset = ctx.idx;
if (build_body(&ctx)) {
bpf_jit_binary_free(header);
goto out;
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2014-12-03 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-03 8:38 Zi Shen Lim [this message]
2014-12-03 15:54 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-12-03 18:04 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1417595881-32218-1-git-send-email-zlim.lnx@gmail.com \
--to=zlim.lnx@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®