From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
acme@kernel.org, ananth@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] kprobes: Fix kallsyms lookup across powerpc ABIv1 and ABIv2
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:37:22 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1418204242.9279.4.camel@ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a96a9c262a818112955da93f8ff1ada1bfe5c59.1418146300.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 23:03 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Currently, all non-dot symbols are being treated as function descriptors
> in ABIv1. This is incorrect and is resulting in perf probe not working:
I don't understand that first sentence. With ABIv1 non-dot symbols *are*
function descriptors?
> # perf probe do_fork
> Added new event:
> Failed to write event: Invalid argument
> Error: Failed to add events.
> # dmesg | tail -1
> [192268.073063] Could not insert probe at _text+768432: -22
>
> _text is being resolved incorrectly and is resulting in the above error.
> Fix this by changing how we lookup symbol addresses on ppc64. We first
> check for the dot variant of a symbol and look at the non-dot variant
> only if that fails. In this manner, we avoid having to look at the
> function descriptor.
I'm not clear that ppc_local_function_entry() makes sense. On ABIv2 you return
the local entry point, which is fine. But on ABIv1 you just return the
unmodified address, which will be the descriptor if you actually passed it a
function pointer. I think you're assuming that you're passed the text address,
but if that's the case the function is badly named at least.
I also don't understand why we need to ever guess which ABI we're using. We
know which ABI we're built with, so there should be no guess work required.
So at the very least this needs much more explanation.
But to be honest I'm not clear why it even needs a kernel change, don't we just
need perf to understand dot symbols?
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-10 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-09 17:33 [RFC PATCH 0/8] Fix perf probe issues on powerpc Naveen N. Rao
2014-12-09 17:33 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] kprobes: Fix kallsyms lookup across powerpc ABIv1 and ABIv2 Naveen N. Rao
2014-12-10 9:37 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2014-12-10 10:26 ` Naveen N. Rao
2014-12-09 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] perf probe powerpc: Fix symbol fixup issues due to ELF type Naveen N. Rao
2014-12-09 21:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-12-10 9:35 ` Naveen N. Rao
2014-12-10 9:50 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-12-10 10:41 ` Naveen N. Rao
2014-12-09 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] perf probe: Improve detection of file/function name in the probe pattern Naveen N. Rao
2014-12-10 10:00 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-12-10 10:59 ` Naveen N. Rao
2014-12-10 11:12 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-12-09 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] perf probe powerpc: Handle powerpc dot symbols Naveen N. Rao
2014-12-10 10:01 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-12-09 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] perf probe powerpc: Allow matching against " Naveen N. Rao
2014-12-10 10:03 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-12-09 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] perf tools powerpc: Fix PPC64 ELF ABIv2 symbol decoding Naveen N. Rao
2014-12-10 10:13 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-12-10 11:21 ` Naveen N. Rao
2014-12-09 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] perf probe powerpc: Use DWARF info only if necessary Naveen N. Rao
2014-12-10 10:17 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-12-10 11:48 ` Naveen N. Rao
2014-12-09 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] perf probe powerpc: Fixup function entry if using kallsyms lookup Naveen N. Rao
2014-12-09 21:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-12-10 4:11 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2014-12-10 4:12 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] Fix perf probe issues on powerpc Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2015-01-21 12:51 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-01-21 15:33 ` Naveen N. Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1418204242.9279.4.camel@ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®