From: Julian Brost <linux-kernel@0x4a42.net>
To: Julian Brost <linux-kernel@0x4a42.net>,
Fabian Hofmann <fabian.hofmann@fau.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@i4.cs.fau.de,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] perf/x86/intel/uncore: checkpatch: Add newlines after declarations
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:51:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1418921500-5630-6-git-send-email-linux-kernel@0x4a42.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418921500-5630-1-git-send-email-linux-kernel@0x4a42.net>
checkpatch complained about missing newlines after declarations which are added
with this patch.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Julian Brost <linux-kernel@0x4a42.net>
Signed-off-by: Fabian Hofmann <fabian.hofmann@fau.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 4 ++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_nhmex.c | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c | 9 +++++++++
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
index 161655f..32f67c7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
@@ -529,6 +529,7 @@ static void uncore_pmu_event_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
void uncore_pmu_event_read(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct intel_uncore_box *box = uncore_event_to_box(event);
+
uncore_perf_event_update(box, event);
}
@@ -714,6 +715,7 @@ static void __init uncore_type_exit(struct intel_uncore_type *type)
static void __init uncore_types_exit(struct intel_uncore_type **types)
{
int i;
+
for (i = 0; types[i]; i++)
uncore_type_exit(types[i]);
}
@@ -805,6 +807,7 @@ static int uncore_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id
if (UNCORE_PCI_DEV_TYPE(id->driver_data) == UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV) {
int idx = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_IDX(id->driver_data);
+
uncore_extra_pci_dev[phys_id][idx] = pdev;
pci_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
return 0;
@@ -1002,6 +1005,7 @@ static int uncore_cpu_starting(int cpu)
if (exist && exist->phys_id == phys_id) {
atomic_inc(&exist->refcnt);
*per_cpu_ptr(pmu->box, cpu) = exist;
+
if (box) {
list_add(&box->list,
&boxes_to_free);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_nhmex.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_nhmex.c
index 2749965..d51e06c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_nhmex.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_nhmex.c
@@ -1005,6 +1005,7 @@ again:
* the 0~7 bits and the 8~15 bits respectively.
*/
u64 mask = 0xff << ((idx - 2) * 8);
+
if (!__BITS_VALUE(atomic_read(&er->ref), idx - 2, 8) ||
!((er->config ^ config1) & mask)) {
atomic_add(1 << ((idx - 2) * 8), &er->ref);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c
index da905c2..e001cc3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c
@@ -915,6 +915,7 @@ static void snbep_qpi_enable_event(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct perf_eve
if (reg1->idx != EXTRA_REG_NONE) {
int idx = box->pmu->pmu_idx + SNBEP_PCI_QPI_PORT0_FILTER;
struct pci_dev *filter_pdev = uncore_extra_pci_dev[box->phys_id][idx];
+
if (filter_pdev) {
pci_write_config_dword(filter_pdev, reg1->reg,
(u32)reg1->config);
@@ -1136,6 +1137,7 @@ static int snbep_pci2phy_map_init(int devid)
int snbep_uncore_pci_init(void)
{
int ret = snbep_pci2phy_map_init(0x3ce0);
+
if (ret)
return ret;
uncore_pci_uncores = snbep_pci_uncores;
@@ -1148,6 +1150,7 @@ int snbep_uncore_pci_init(void)
static void ivbep_uncore_msr_init_box(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
{
unsigned msr = uncore_msr_box_ctl(box);
+
if (msr)
wrmsrl(msr, IVBEP_PMON_BOX_CTL_INT);
}
@@ -1400,6 +1403,7 @@ static void ivbep_cbox_enable_event(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct perf_ev
if (reg1->idx != EXTRA_REG_NONE) {
u64 filter = uncore_shared_reg_config(box, 0);
+
wrmsrl(reg1->reg, filter & 0xffffffff);
wrmsrl(reg1->reg + 6, filter >> 32);
}
@@ -1700,6 +1704,7 @@ static struct pci_driver ivbep_uncore_pci_driver = {
int ivbep_uncore_pci_init(void)
{
int ret = snbep_pci2phy_map_init(0x0e1e);
+
if (ret)
return ret;
uncore_pci_uncores = ivbep_pci_uncores;
@@ -1728,6 +1733,7 @@ static struct attribute_group hswep_uncore_ubox_format_group = {
static int hswep_ubox_hw_config(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct perf_event *event)
{
struct hw_perf_event_extra *reg1 = &event->hw.extra_reg;
+
reg1->reg = HSWEP_U_MSR_PMON_FILTER;
reg1->config = event->attr.config1 & HSWEP_U_MSR_PMON_BOX_FILTER_MASK;
reg1->idx = 0;
@@ -1835,6 +1841,7 @@ static struct extra_reg hswep_uncore_cbox_extra_regs[] = {
static u64 hswep_cbox_filter_mask(int fields)
{
u64 mask = 0;
+
if (fields & 0x1)
mask |= HSWEP_CB0_MSR_PMON_BOX_FILTER_TID;
if (fields & 0x2)
@@ -1887,6 +1894,7 @@ static void hswep_cbox_enable_event(struct intel_uncore_box *box,
if (reg1->idx != EXTRA_REG_NONE) {
u64 filter = uncore_shared_reg_config(box, 0);
+
wrmsrl(reg1->reg, filter & 0xffffffff);
wrmsrl(reg1->reg + 1, filter >> 32);
}
@@ -2290,6 +2298,7 @@ static struct pci_driver hswep_uncore_pci_driver = {
int hswep_uncore_pci_init(void)
{
int ret = snbep_pci2phy_map_init(0x2f1e);
+
if (ret)
return ret;
uncore_pci_uncores = hswep_pci_uncores;
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-18 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-16 17:30 [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix coding style Julian Brost
2014-12-17 8:09 ` Julian Brost
2014-12-18 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix multiple coding style issues Julian Brost
2014-12-18 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] perf/x86/intel/uncore: checkpatch: Replace deprecated macro Julian Brost
2014-12-18 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] perf/x86/intel/uncore: checkpatch: Replace kzalloc with kcalloc Julian Brost
2014-12-18 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] perf/x86/intel/uncore: coding style: Fix alignment in macros Julian Brost
2014-12-18 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] perf/x86/intel/uncore: checkpatch: Remove unnecessary line continuation Julian Brost
2014-12-18 16:51 ` Julian Brost [this message]
2015-01-09 21:02 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix multiple coding style issues Julian Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1418921500-5630-6-git-send-email-linux-kernel@0x4a42.net \
--to=linux-kernel@0x4a42.net \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=fabian.hofmann@fau.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@i4.cs.fau.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome