From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] perf diff: Print diff result more precisely
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 14:06:31 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1419656793-32756-3-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1419656793-32756-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
Current perf diff result is somewhat confusing since it sometimes hide
small result and sometimes there's no result. So do not hide small
result (less than 0.01%) and print "N/A" if baseline is not
recorded (for ratio and wdiff only). Blank means the baseline is
available but its pairs are not.
Before:
# Baseline Delta Shared Object Symbol
# ........ ....... ................. .........................
#
...
0.01% -0.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] native_write_msr_safe
0.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] scheduler_tick
0.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] native_read_msr_safe
0.00% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __rcu_read_unlock
[kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_lock
+0.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] apic_timer_interrupt
[kernel.kallsyms] [k] read_tsc
After:
# Baseline Delta Shared Object Symbol
# ........ ....... ................. .........................
#
...
0.01% -0.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] native_write_msr_safe
0.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] scheduler_tick
0.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] native_read_msr_safe
0.00% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __rcu_read_unlock
+0.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_lock
+0.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] apic_timer_interrupt
+0.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] read_tsc
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/builtin-diff.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
index 72c718e6549c..3f86737da2c4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
@@ -788,7 +788,7 @@ static int __hpp__color_compare(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
char pfmt[20] = " ";
if (!pair)
- goto dummy_print;
+ goto no_print;
switch (comparison_method) {
case COMPUTE_DELTA:
@@ -797,8 +797,6 @@ static int __hpp__color_compare(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
else
diff = compute_delta(he, pair);
- if (fabs(diff) < 0.01)
- goto dummy_print;
scnprintf(pfmt, 20, "%%%+d.2f%%%%", dfmt->header_width - 1);
return percent_color_snprintf(hpp->buf, hpp->size,
pfmt, diff);
@@ -830,6 +828,9 @@ static int __hpp__color_compare(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
}
dummy_print:
return scnprintf(hpp->buf, hpp->size, "%*s",
+ dfmt->header_width, "N/A");
+no_print:
+ return scnprintf(hpp->buf, hpp->size, "%*s",
dfmt->header_width, pfmt);
}
@@ -879,14 +880,15 @@ hpp__entry_pair(struct hist_entry *he, struct hist_entry *pair,
else
diff = compute_delta(he, pair);
- if (fabs(diff) >= 0.01)
- scnprintf(buf, size, "%+4.2F%%", diff);
+ scnprintf(buf, size, "%+4.2F%%", diff);
break;
case PERF_HPP_DIFF__RATIO:
/* No point for ratio number if we are dummy.. */
- if (he->dummy)
+ if (he->dummy) {
+ scnprintf(buf, size, "N/A");
break;
+ }
if (pair->diff.computed)
ratio = pair->diff.period_ratio;
@@ -899,8 +901,10 @@ hpp__entry_pair(struct hist_entry *he, struct hist_entry *pair,
case PERF_HPP_DIFF__WEIGHTED_DIFF:
/* No point for wdiff number if we are dummy.. */
- if (he->dummy)
+ if (he->dummy) {
+ scnprintf(buf, size, "N/A");
break;
+ }
if (pair->diff.computed)
wdiff = pair->diff.wdiff;
--
2.2.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-27 5:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-27 5:06 [PATCH RESEND 1/5] perf diff: Fix to sort by baseline field by default Namhyung Kim
2014-12-27 5:06 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/5] perf diff: Get rid of hists__compute_resort() Namhyung Kim
2015-01-04 16:33 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-01-28 15:06 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2014-12-27 5:06 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2015-01-04 16:47 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf diff: Print diff result more precisely Jiri Olsa
2015-01-07 14:02 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-01-28 15:07 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2014-12-27 5:06 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf diff: Fix output ordering to honor next column Namhyung Kim
2015-01-04 18:16 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-01-07 7:42 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-12-27 5:06 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf diff: Fix -o/--order option behavior Namhyung Kim
2015-01-04 18:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-01-07 7:47 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-01-07 8:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-01-07 13:31 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-01-08 9:53 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf diff: Fix to sort by baseline field by default tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1419656793-32756-3-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®