From: Bo Yan <byan@nvidia.com>
To: <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <luke.starrett@broadcom.com>
Subject: a question about IP checksum helper for arm64
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:27:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <141d76cc-d43b-5412-fb39-426d7c2261b9@nvidia.com> (raw)
Hi Robin, Luke,
Recently I bumped into an error when running GCC undefined behavior
sanitizer:
UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in
kernel-4.9/arch/arm64/include/asm/checksum.h:34:6
load of misaligned address ffffffc198c8b254 for type 'const
__int128 unsigned'
which requires 16 byte alignment
The relevant code:
tmp = *(const __uint128_t *)iph;
iph += 16;
ihl -= 4;
tmp += ((tmp >> 64) | (tmp << 64));
sum = tmp >> 64;
do {
sum += *(const u32 *)iph;
iph += 4;
} while (--ihl);
But, I checked the generated disassembly, it doesn't look like anything
special is generated taking advantage of that.
I'm using Linaro GCC 6.4-2017.08, expecting ldp instructions to be
emitted, but don't see it.
There were some prior discussions about GCC behavior, like this thread:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9081911/ , in which you talked about
the difference between GCC4 and GCC5.3. It looks to me this is regressed
in Linaro GCC6.4 build.
I have not checked newer GCC versions.
Will it be more stable to just do this with inline assembly instead of
relying on __uint128_t data type?
GCC documentation says __int128 is supported for targets which have an
integer mode wide enough to hold 128 bits. aarch64 doesn't have such an
integer mode.
Thanks
Bo
next reply other threads:[~2018-07-06 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-06 16:27 Bo Yan [this message]
2018-07-09 11:54 ` Robin Murphy
2018-07-09 19:53 ` Bo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=141d76cc-d43b-5412-fb39-426d7c2261b9@nvidia.com \
--to=byan@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luke.starrett@broadcom.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®