From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755874AbbAFQzN (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2015 11:55:13 -0500 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:41818 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751076AbbAFQzM (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2015 11:55:12 -0500 Message-ID: <1420563279.3719.15.camel@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] misc: sram: switch to ioremap_wc from ioremap From: Philipp Zabel To: Abhilash Kesavan Cc: Tony Lindgren , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Santosh Shilimkar , "heiko@sntech.de" , "Li.Xiubo@freescale.com" , "shc_work@mail.ru" , "nicoleotsuka@gmail.com" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "corbet@lwn.net" , "padma.v@samsung.com" , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "shawn.guo@freescale.com" , "bcousson@baylibre.com" , "kernel@pengutronix.de" , "kgene@kernel.org" , Pawel Moll Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 17:54:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1418266726-12004-1-git-send-email-a.kesavan@samsung.com> <1418266726-12004-2-git-send-email-a.kesavan@samsung.com> <1418292513.3188.4.camel@pengutronix.de> <20141211103919.GA6067@arm.com> <1418298046.3188.10.camel@pengutronix.de> <20141211145849.GH31456@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20150105181823.GG4081@atomide.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:96de:80ff:fec2:9969 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Abhilash, Am Dienstag, den 06.01.2015, 19:57 +0530 schrieb Abhilash Kesavan: > >> From the existing dts files, omap, imx, rockchip and exynos seem to be > >> the only users of the sram allocator code. I have tested this on > >> Exynos5420, Exynos5800 and Exynos7; there is no change in behavior > >> seen on these boards. Tested-by for other SoCs would be appreciated. > > > > Sorry for the delay, these seems to boot OK on omap4, so from that > > point of view: > > > > Tested-by: Tony Lindgren > > Thanks a lot for testing this. If someone with imx and rockchip boards > could help test this out, then we could look to get this in. This shouldn't be a problem on i.MX, the coda driver doesn't access SRAM from the CPU at all. regards Philipp