From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
bobby.prani@gmail.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/10] rcu: Improve diagnostics for spurious RCU CPU stall warnings
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 09:52:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1420653168-6434-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420653168-6434-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The current RCU CPU stall warning code will print "Stall ended before
state dump start" any time that the stall-warning code is triggered on
a CPU that has already reported a quiescent state for the current grace
period and if all quiescent states have been reported for the current
grace period. However, a true stall can result in these symptoms, for
example, by preventing RCU's grace-period kthreads from ever running
This commit therefore checks for this condition, reporting the end of
the stall only if one of the grace-period counters has actually advanced.
Otherwise, it reports the last time that the grace-period kthread made
meaningful progress. (In normal situations, the grace-period kthread
should make meaningful progress at least every jiffies_till_next_fqs
jiffies.)
Reported-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
---
Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt | 5 +++++
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt b/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt
index ed186a902d31..55f9707fe60a 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt
@@ -187,6 +187,11 @@ o For !CONFIG_PREEMPT kernels, a CPU looping anywhere in the
behavior, you might need to replace some of the cond_resched()
calls with calls to cond_resched_rcu_qs().
+o Anything that prevents RCU's grace-period kthreads from running.
+ This can result in the "All QSes seen" console-log message.
+ This message will include information on when the kthread last
+ ran and how often it should be expected to run.
+
o A CPU-bound real-time task in a CONFIG_PREEMPT kernel, which might
happen to preempt a low-priority task in the middle of an RCU
read-side critical section. This is especially damaging if
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 654b15be1e36..a2ceb66bcd67 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1066,11 +1066,13 @@ static void rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(struct rcu_state *rsp)
}
}
-static void print_other_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp)
+static void print_other_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long gpnum)
{
int cpu;
long delta;
unsigned long flags;
+ unsigned long gpa;
+ unsigned long j;
int ndetected = 0;
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
long totqlen = 0;
@@ -1123,10 +1125,22 @@ static void print_other_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp)
pr_cont("(detected by %d, t=%ld jiffies, g=%ld, c=%ld, q=%lu)\n",
smp_processor_id(), (long)(jiffies - rsp->gp_start),
(long)rsp->gpnum, (long)rsp->completed, totqlen);
- if (ndetected == 0)
- pr_err("INFO: Stall ended before state dump start\n");
- else
+ if (ndetected) {
rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(rsp);
+ } else {
+ if (ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gpnum) != gpnum ||
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->completed) == gpnum) {
+ pr_err("INFO: Stall ended before state dump start\n");
+ } else {
+ j = jiffies;
+ gpa = ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_activity);
+ pr_err("All QSes seen, last %s kthread activity %ld (%ld-%ld), jiffies_till_next_fqs=%ld\n",
+ rsp->name, j - gpa, j, gpa,
+ jiffies_till_next_fqs);
+ /* In this case, the current CPU might be at fault. */
+ sched_show_task(current);
+ }
+ }
/* Complain about tasks blocking the grace period. */
@@ -1226,7 +1240,7 @@ static void check_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
ULONG_CMP_GE(j, js + RCU_STALL_RAT_DELAY)) {
/* They had a few time units to dump stack, so complain. */
- print_other_cpu_stall(rsp);
+ print_other_cpu_stall(rsp, gpnum);
}
}
@@ -1622,6 +1636,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
struct rcu_data *rdp;
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_activity) = jiffies;
rcu_bind_gp_kthread();
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
@@ -1682,6 +1697,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
rnp->grphi, rnp->qsmask);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
cond_resched_rcu_qs();
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_activity) = jiffies;
}
mutex_unlock(&rsp->onoff_mutex);
@@ -1698,6 +1714,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_fqs(struct rcu_state *rsp, int fqs_state_in)
unsigned long maxj;
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_activity) = jiffies;
rsp->n_force_qs++;
if (fqs_state == RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK) {
/* Collect dyntick-idle snapshots. */
@@ -1736,6 +1753,7 @@ static void rcu_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp)
struct rcu_data *rdp;
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_activity) = jiffies;
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
gp_duration = jiffies - rsp->gp_start;
@@ -1772,6 +1790,7 @@ static void rcu_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp)
nocb += rcu_future_gp_cleanup(rsp, rnp);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
cond_resched_rcu_qs();
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_activity) = jiffies;
}
rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
@@ -1821,6 +1840,7 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
if (rcu_gp_init(rsp))
break;
cond_resched_rcu_qs();
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_activity) = jiffies;
WARN_ON(signal_pending(current));
trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name,
ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gpnum),
@@ -1864,9 +1884,11 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gpnum),
TPS("fqsend"));
cond_resched_rcu_qs();
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_activity) = jiffies;
} else {
/* Deal with stray signal. */
cond_resched_rcu_qs();
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_activity) = jiffies;
WARN_ON(signal_pending(current));
trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name,
ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gpnum),
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index e300848cc0cf..5ec81cf938fd 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -488,6 +488,8 @@ struct rcu_state {
/* due to no GP active. */
unsigned long gp_start; /* Time at which GP started, */
/* but in jiffies. */
+ unsigned long gp_activity; /* Time of last GP kthread */
+ /* activity in jiffies. */
unsigned long jiffies_stall; /* Time at which to check */
/* for CPU stalls. */
unsigned long jiffies_resched; /* Time at which to resched */
--
1.8.1.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-07 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-07 17:52 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/9] Stall-warning changes for 3.20 Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/10] rcu: Set default to RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO=y Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/10] rcutorture: Add checks for stall ending before dump start Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/10] rcu: Make RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO include number of fqs attempts Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:52 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-01-07 17:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/10] rcu: Handle gpnum/completed wrap while dyntick idle Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/10] rcu: Run grace-period kthreads at real-time priority Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/10] rcu: Make cond_resched_rcu_qs() apply to normal RCU flavors Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/10] rcu: Add GP-kthread-starvation checks to CPU stall warnings Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/10] rcu: Fix RCU CPU stall detection in tiny implementation Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 17:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/10] rcu: Initialize tiny RCU stall-warning timeouts at boot Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1420653168-6434-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®