mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Yogesh Ahire <yogesh02061983@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sched_yield() call on Linux Kernel 2.6.39 is not behaving correct
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 06:26:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1420694794.5279.33.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH86sKKCbZ7CYDEgAnpiVH+7TZNOjziUYOJSWHEpQyY3eUSniA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 16:30 -0500, Yogesh Ahire wrote: 
> Hi All,
> 
> I have a system with multiple CPU cores.  I have multiple threads
> assigned to particular CPU. Among these threads the main thread calls
> sched_yield() if it has nothing to do, I am hoping that doing so will
> give chance to other threads to run. But the strange behavior of
> sched_yield() is , even if there are ready-to-runs tasks on this CPU
> waiting for their turn, the task which calls sched_yield() is always
> running ( get scheduled) and not giving chance to any other task to
> run. It is consuming 100% of CPU. Is sched_yield() is broken on 2.6
> Kernel?

Nope, your expectation is likely busted.  sched_yield() for a fair class
task is merely a resched check in CFS.  IFF there's a runnable task
that's more deserving by the CFS definition thereof, it'll initiate a
context switch, otherwise it's a non-free noop.  For realtime class
tasks, behavior is predictable, the scheduler WILL initiate a context
switch IFF there is a runnable task of >= yielding tasks priority on the
same CPU.  If you depend on a context switch happening in any other
circumstance, you're gonna be seriously disappointed.

-Mike


  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-08  5:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-07 21:30 Yogesh Ahire
2015-01-08  5:26 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2015-01-08 15:00   ` Yogesh Ahire
2015-01-09  3:14     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-01-09 19:24       ` Yogesh Ahire
2015-01-10  7:37         ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1420694794.5279.33.camel@marge.simpson.net \
    --to=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yogesh02061983@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®