From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Yogesh Ahire <yogesh02061983@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sched_yield() call on Linux Kernel 2.6.39 is not behaving correct
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 06:26:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1420694794.5279.33.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH86sKKCbZ7CYDEgAnpiVH+7TZNOjziUYOJSWHEpQyY3eUSniA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 16:30 -0500, Yogesh Ahire wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a system with multiple CPU cores. I have multiple threads
> assigned to particular CPU. Among these threads the main thread calls
> sched_yield() if it has nothing to do, I am hoping that doing so will
> give chance to other threads to run. But the strange behavior of
> sched_yield() is , even if there are ready-to-runs tasks on this CPU
> waiting for their turn, the task which calls sched_yield() is always
> running ( get scheduled) and not giving chance to any other task to
> run. It is consuming 100% of CPU. Is sched_yield() is broken on 2.6
> Kernel?
Nope, your expectation is likely busted. sched_yield() for a fair class
task is merely a resched check in CFS. IFF there's a runnable task
that's more deserving by the CFS definition thereof, it'll initiate a
context switch, otherwise it's a non-free noop. For realtime class
tasks, behavior is predictable, the scheduler WILL initiate a context
switch IFF there is a runnable task of >= yielding tasks priority on the
same CPU. If you depend on a context switch happening in any other
circumstance, you're gonna be seriously disappointed.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-08 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-07 21:30 Yogesh Ahire
2015-01-08 5:26 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2015-01-08 15:00 ` Yogesh Ahire
2015-01-09 3:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-01-09 19:24 ` Yogesh Ahire
2015-01-10 7:37 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1420694794.5279.33.camel@marge.simpson.net \
--to=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yogesh02061983@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®