From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753601AbbANPzd (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:55:33 -0500 Received: from smtp2.provo.novell.com ([137.65.250.81]:33778 "EHLO smtp2.provo.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750920AbbANPzc (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:55:32 -0500 Message-ID: <1421250926.2258.14.camel@stgolabs.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] locking/mcs: Better differentiate between mcs variants From: Davidlohr Bueso To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:55:26 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20150114141356.GA12084@gmail.com> References: <1419757883-4423-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> <1419757883-4423-7-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> <20150114141356.GA12084@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Ingo, > x86 defconfig produces: > > kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h:81:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ASSIGN_ONCE’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > Also, this patch should really be split into three separate (and > tested) patches. These patches were tested, the failure is because the ASSIGN_ONCE function was renamed only yesterday (see 43239cbe79fc369f5d2160bd7f69e28b5c50a58c). Thanks, Davidlohr