From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932176AbbA0K0s (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 05:26:48 -0500 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.184]:32938 "EHLO mailgw02.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755410AbbA0K0o (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 05:26:44 -0500 X-Listener-Flag: 11101 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: mediatek: Add config options for mediatek SoCs. From: Yingjoe Chen To: Paul Bolle CC: Valentin Rothberg , Matthias Brugger , Hongzhou Yang , Rob Herring , Linus Walleij , Sascha Hauer , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Russell King , Grant Likely , Catalin Marinas , Vladimir Murzin , Ashwin Chaugule , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , , , , , huang eddie , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD In-Reply-To: <1422353800.14015.35.camel@x220> References: <1421818097-9281-1-git-send-email-hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com> <1421818097-9281-2-git-send-email-hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com> <1422353800.14015.35.camel@x220> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 18:26:40 +0800 Message-ID: <1422354400.32212.25.camel@mtksdaap41> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 11:16 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > Joe, > > On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 13:54 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > 2015-01-21 6:28 GMT+01:00 Hongzhou Yang : > > > From: Yingjoe Chen > > > > > > The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC > > > and we don't want to bloat the kernel binary if we don't need it. > > > Add config options so we can build for one SoC only. > > > > > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > > > Signed-off-by: Yingjoe Chen > > > Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang > > > > Applied to v3.20-next/soc > > This became commit ad8a221e1f49 ("ARM: mediatek: Add config options for > mediatek SoCs.") in today's linux-next (ie, next-20150127). I noticed > because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a problem with it. > > > > --- > > > arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig > > > index f73f588..f7e463c 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig > > > @@ -1,6 +1,26 @@ > > > -config ARCH_MEDIATEK > > > +menuconfig ARCH_MEDIATEK > > > bool "Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx SoC" if ARCH_MULTI_V7 > > > select ARM_GIC > > > select MTK_TIMER > > > help > > > Support for Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx SoCs > > > + > > > +if ARCH_MEDIATEK > > > + > > > +config MACH_MT6589 > > > + bool "MediaTek MT6589 SoCs support" > > > + default ARCH_MEDIATEK > > > + > > > +config MACH_MT6592 > > > + bool "MediaTek MT6592 SoCs support" > > > + default ARCH_MEDIATEK > > > + > > > +config MACH_MT8127 > > > + bool "MediaTek MT8127 SoCs support" > > > + default ARCH_MEDIATEK > > > + > > > +config MACH_MT8135 > > > + bool "MediaTek MT8135 SoCs support" > > > + default ARCH_MEDIATEK > > > + > > > +endif > > None of these four new MACH_MT* Kconfig symbols are currently used in > linux-next. I assume that patches that actually use them (either as a > Kconfig symbol or as a CONFIG_* macro) are still pending. Is that > correct? Yes, it is used in patch 3 in this series[1], and is discussed in [2]. Joe.C [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/318453.html [2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/315616.html