From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965532AbbBDMWb (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:22:31 -0500 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews06.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.9]:49832 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews06.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964860AbbBDMW1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:22:27 -0500 Message-ID: <1423052553.30076.6.camel@tiscali.nl> Subject: Re: watchdog: SOC_MT7621? From: Paul Bolle To: John Crispin Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck , Ralf Baechle , Valentin Rothberg , Guenter Roeck , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 13:22:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <54D1FE0F.3030308@openwrt.org> References: <1423044809.23894.65.camel@x220> <54D1F248.4090406@openwrt.org> <1423047893.23022.13.camel@x220> <54D1FE0F.3030308@openwrt.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10 (3.12.10-1.fc21) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2015 12:22:25.0968 (UTC) FILETIME=[3C3C4B00:01D04075] X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org John Crispin schreef op wo 04-02-2015 om 12:10 [+0100]: > i think wim should just drop it and we leave it in openwrt with the > other 1/2 million patches that we have. i prefer to upstream the stuff > without feeling pressured to hurry up, that kills the fun. Once code is mainlined you'll get fixes written for you, updates done for you, etc. But you'll also get pointed at defects that require you to fix them yourself, or see the code removed eventually. > @Wim, can you drop the patch please ? Why should Wim drop more than the || SOC_MT7621 snippet? Paul Bolle