From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755521AbbBGIiK (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2015 03:38:10 -0500 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews07.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.10]:60070 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews07.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752217AbbBGIiI (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2015 03:38:08 -0500 Message-ID: <1423298284.2246.5.camel@x220> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: samsung: clean up references to outdated Kconfig symbols From: Paul Bolle To: Mark Brown Cc: Kukjin Kim , Sangbeom Kim , Liam Girdwood , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Valentin Rothberg , Arnd Bergmann , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 09:38:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20150206235044.GO31311@finisterre.sirena.org.uk> References: <1421664067.9655.51.camel@x220> <20150206235044.GO31311@finisterre.sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-4.fc20) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Feb 2015 08:38:05.0897 (UTC) FILETIME=[64A5B390:01D042B1] X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 07:50 +0800, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:41:07AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > > A few series of ARM cleanups regarding S5PC100 and S5PV210 were included > > in v3.17. These series removed these five Kconfig symbols: > > MACH_AQUILA > > MACH_GONI > > MACH_SMDKC100 > > MACH_SMDKC110 > > MACH_SMDKV210 > > > > This series, done on top of next-20150119, removes the remaining > > If you are posting a patch series please ensure that all the patches in > the series are threaded in reply to the cover letter (or first patch if > there isn't one) so that mail clients can see to display them as a > series. Patches 2/4, 3/4, and 4/4 didn't apply. Locally I carry them in a tree that constantly rebases on top of linux-next. So locally I carry these patches on top of next-20150204. What tree would you like me to rebase this onto? Paul Bolle