mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
To: <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<mingo@redhat.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	<ananth@in.ibm.com>, <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	<davem@davemloft.net>, <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	<luto@amacapital.net>, <keescook@chromium.org>, <oleg@redhat.com>,
	<wangnan0@huawei.com>, <dave.long@linaro.org>, <tixy@linaro.org>,
	<nico@linaro.org>, <yalin.wang2010@gmail.com>,
	<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <Yalin.Wang@sonymobile.com>,
	<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	<jkenisto@us.ibm.com>, <anton@samba.org>, <stefani@seibold.net>,
	<JBeulich@suse.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	<rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<prarit@redhat.com>, <fabf@skynet.be>, <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <lizefan@huawei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 01/26] kprobes: set kprobes_all_disarmed earlier to enable re-optimization.
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:40:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1423806019-61532-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423805941-61407-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>

In original code, the probed instruction doesn't get optimized after

echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled

This is because original code checks kprobes_all_disarmed in
optimize_kprobe(), but this flag is turned off after calling that
function. Therefore, optimize_kprobe() will see
kprobes_all_disarmed == true and doesn't do the optimization.

This patch simply turns off kprobes_all_disarmed earlier to enable
optimization.

Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
 kernel/kprobes.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index 2ca272f..c397900 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -2320,6 +2320,12 @@ static void arm_all_kprobes(void)
 	if (!kprobes_all_disarmed)
 		goto already_enabled;
 
+	/*
+	 * optimize_kprobe() called by arm_kprobe() checks
+	 * kprobes_all_disarmed, so set kprobes_all_disarmed before
+	 * arm_kprobe.
+	 */
+	kprobes_all_disarmed = false;
 	/* Arming kprobes doesn't optimize kprobe itself */
 	for (i = 0; i < KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
 		head = &kprobe_table[i];
@@ -2328,7 +2334,6 @@ static void arm_all_kprobes(void)
 				arm_kprobe(p);
 	}
 
-	kprobes_all_disarmed = false;
 	printk(KERN_INFO "Kprobes globally enabled\n");
 
 already_enabled:
-- 
1.8.4


  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-13  5:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-13  5:39 [RFC PATCH v3 00/26] Early kprobe: enable kprobes at very early booting stage Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:40 ` Wang Nan [this message]
2015-02-13  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/26] kprobes: makes kprobes/enabled works correctly for optimized kprobes Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/26] kprobes: x86: mark 2 bytes NOP as boostable Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/26] ftrace: don't update record flags if code modification fail Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/26] ftrace/x86: Ensure rec->flags no change when failure occures Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/26] ftrace: sort ftrace entries earlier Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/26] ftrace: allow search ftrace addr before ftrace fully inited Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/26] ftrace: enable make ftrace nop before ftrace_init() Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/26] ftrace: allow fixing code update failure by notifier chain Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/26] ftrace: x86: try to fix ftrace when ftrace_replace_code Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/26] early kprobes: introduce kprobe_is_early for futher early kprobe use Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/26] early kprobes: Add an KPROBE_FLAG_EARLY for early kprobe Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/26] early kprobes: ARM: directly modify code Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/26] early kprobes: ARM: introduce early kprobes related code area Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/26] early kprobes: x86: directly modify code Wang Nan
2015-02-20  4:00   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-02-13  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/26] early kprobes: x86: introduce early kprobes related code area Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 17/26] early kprobes: introduces macros for allocing early kprobe resources Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 18/26] early kprobes: allows __alloc_insn_slot() from early kprobes slots Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 19/26] early kprobes: perhibit probing at early kprobe reserved area Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 20/26] early kprobes: core logic of eraly kprobes Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 21/26] early kprobes: add CONFIG_EARLY_KPROBES option Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 22/26] early kprobes: introduce arch_fix_ftrace_early_kprobe() Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 23/26] early kprobes: x86: arch_restore_optimized_kprobe() Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 24/26] early kprobes: core logic to support early kprobe on ftrace Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 25/26] early kprobes: introduce kconfig option " Wang Nan
2015-02-13  5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 26/26] kprobes: enable 'ekprobe=' cmdline option for early kprobes Wang Nan
2015-02-20  3:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/26] Early kprobe: enable kprobes at very early booting stage Masami Hiramatsu
2015-02-25 11:11   ` Wang Nan
2015-02-25 11:46     ` Wang Nan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1423806019-61532-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com \
    --to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=Yalin.Wang@sonymobile.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fabf@skynet.be \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nico@linaro.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=stefani@seibold.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tixy@linaro.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yalin.wang2010@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®