mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: riel@redhat.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] cpusets,isolcpus: resolve conflict between cpusets and isolcpus
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 16:45:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1424727906-4460-1-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com> (raw)

Ensure that cpus specified with the isolcpus= boot commandline
option stay outside of the load balancing in the kernel scheduler.

Operations like load balancing can introduce unwanted latencies,
which is exactly what the isolcpus= commandline is there to prevent.

Previously, simply creating a new cpuset, without even touching the
cpuset.cpus field inside the new cpuset, would undo the effects of
isolcpus=, by creating a scheduler domain spanning the whole system,
and setting up load balancing inside that domain. The cpuset root
cpuset.cpus file is read-only, so there was not even a way to undo
that effect.

This does not impact the majority of cpusets users, since isolcpus=
is a fairly specialized feature used for realtime purposes.


             reply	other threads:[~2015-02-23 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-23 21:45 riel [this message]
2015-02-23 21:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpusets,isolcpus: exclude isolcpus from load balancing in cpusets riel
2015-02-25  2:10   ` David Rientjes
2015-02-23 21:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpusets,isolcpus: add file to show isolated cpus in cpuset riel
2015-02-25  2:15   ` David Rientjes
2015-02-25  3:30     ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-24  2:18 ` [PATCH 0/2] cpusets,isolcpus: resolve conflict between cpusets and isolcpus Mike Galbraith
2015-02-24 14:13   ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-24 14:22     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-02-24 14:29     ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1424727906-4460-1-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome