Re: [Lse-tech] Re: LSE conference call

[Hanna Linder <hannal@us.ibm.com>]

I am getting reports of some conflicts. Would 2pm on Thursday
or 3pm on Friday be acceptable? Pacific Time that is...

Remember this is every other week (at best ;)

Hanna


--On Tuesday, April 22, 2003 11:36:12 AM -0700 Jack F Vogel <jfv@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> 
> Long as its not before my morning coffee :) I think this is a good idea
> Hanna
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jack
> 
> 
> John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>@lists.sourceforge.net on 04/22/2003
> 10:49:41 AM
> 
> Sent by:    lse-tech-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
> 
> 
> To:    hannal@us.ltcfwd.linux.ibm.com
> cc:    lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, john@grabjohn.com (John Bradford),
>        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cliffw@osdl.org, wli@holomorphy.com
> Subject:    [Lse-tech] Re: LSE conference call
> 
> 
>> In light of our speaker sleeping through the meeting and
>> the fact that kernel hackers tend not to be awake early
>> in the morning I propose moving the time of the call to
>> 1pm Pacific Time (GMT-0800).
> 
> 10 PM U.K. time is no problem for me.
> 
>> Originally we chose 9:30am to encourage people in Europe and
>> India to attend. However, the time change has not increased
>> attendance so I think we should move it to a more reasonable
>> time for North American Continental dwellers who are the
>> main attendees.
>> 
>> Any comments? Debate? Hate mail?
> 
> Flame war?  :-)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>