From: riel@redhat.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -v2 0/2] cpusets,isolcpus: resolve conflict between cpusets and isolcpus
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:38:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1424882288-2910-1-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com> (raw)
-v2 addresses the conflict David Rientjes spotted between my previous
patches and commit e8e6d97c9b ("cpuset: use %*pb[l] to print bitmaps
including cpumasks and nodemasks")
Ensure that cpus specified with the isolcpus= boot commandline
option stay outside of the load balancing in the kernel scheduler.
Operations like load balancing can introduce unwanted latencies,
which is exactly what the isolcpus= commandline is there to prevent.
Previously, simply creating a new cpuset, without even touching the
cpuset.cpus field inside the new cpuset, would undo the effects of
isolcpus=, by creating a scheduler domain spanning the whole system,
and setting up load balancing inside that domain. The cpuset root
cpuset.cpus file is read-only, so there was not even a way to undo
that effect.
This does not impact the majority of cpusets users, since isolcpus=
is a fairly specialized feature used for realtime purposes.
next reply other threads:[~2015-02-25 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-25 16:38 riel [this message]
2015-02-25 16:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpusets,isolcpus: exclude isolcpus from load balancing in cpusets riel
2015-02-27 9:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-27 17:08 ` [PATCH 3/2] cpusets,isolcpus: document relationship between cpusets & isolcpus Rik van Riel
2015-02-27 21:15 ` David Rientjes
2015-02-28 3:23 ` Zefan Li
2015-02-28 3:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpusets,isolcpus: exclude isolcpus from load balancing in cpusets Zefan Li
2015-02-25 16:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpusets,isolcpus: add file to show isolated cpus in cpuset riel
2015-02-25 21:09 ` David Rientjes
2015-02-25 21:21 ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-25 21:32 ` [PATCH v3 " Rik van Riel
2015-02-26 11:05 ` [PATCH " Zefan Li
2015-02-26 15:24 ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-26 17:12 ` [PATCH v4 " Rik van Riel
2015-02-28 3:22 ` Zefan Li
2015-03-02 6:15 ` Zefan Li
2015-03-02 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-03 9:51 ` Zefan Li
2015-03-02 9:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-02 12:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-03-02 14:35 ` Rik van Riel
2015-03-02 14:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-03-02 15:29 ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-02 16:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-03-02 16:09 ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-02 17:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-03-02 17:01 ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-02 17:31 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1424882288-2910-1-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome