mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: riel@redhat.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -v2 0/2] cpusets,isolcpus: resolve conflict between cpusets and isolcpus
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:38:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1424882288-2910-1-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com> (raw)

-v2 addresses the conflict David Rientjes spotted between my previous
patches and commit e8e6d97c9b ("cpuset: use %*pb[l] to print bitmaps
including cpumasks and nodemasks")

Ensure that cpus specified with the isolcpus= boot commandline
option stay outside of the load balancing in the kernel scheduler.

Operations like load balancing can introduce unwanted latencies,
which is exactly what the isolcpus= commandline is there to prevent.

Previously, simply creating a new cpuset, without even touching the
cpuset.cpus field inside the new cpuset, would undo the effects of
isolcpus=, by creating a scheduler domain spanning the whole system,
and setting up load balancing inside that domain. The cpuset root
cpuset.cpus file is read-only, so there was not even a way to undo
that effect.

This does not impact the majority of cpusets users, since isolcpus=
is a fairly specialized feature used for realtime purposes.


             reply	other threads:[~2015-02-25 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-25 16:38 riel [this message]
2015-02-25 16:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpusets,isolcpus: exclude isolcpus from load balancing in cpusets riel
2015-02-27  9:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-27 17:08     ` [PATCH 3/2] cpusets,isolcpus: document relationship between cpusets & isolcpus Rik van Riel
2015-02-27 21:15       ` David Rientjes
2015-02-28  3:23       ` Zefan Li
2015-02-28  3:21   ` [PATCH 1/2] cpusets,isolcpus: exclude isolcpus from load balancing in cpusets Zefan Li
2015-02-25 16:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpusets,isolcpus: add file to show isolated cpus in cpuset riel
2015-02-25 21:09   ` David Rientjes
2015-02-25 21:21     ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-25 21:32   ` [PATCH v3 " Rik van Riel
2015-02-26 11:05   ` [PATCH " Zefan Li
2015-02-26 15:24     ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-26 17:12     ` [PATCH v4 " Rik van Riel
2015-02-28  3:22       ` Zefan Li
2015-03-02  6:15       ` Zefan Li
2015-03-02  9:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-03  9:51           ` Zefan Li
2015-03-02  9:09       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-02 12:44         ` Mike Galbraith
2015-03-02 14:35           ` Rik van Riel
2015-03-02 14:54             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-03-02 15:29           ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-02 16:02             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-03-02 16:09               ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-02 17:35                 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-03-02 17:01       ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-02 17:31         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1424882288-2910-1-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome