From: Lino Sanfilippo <lsanfil@marvell.com>
To: <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>,
Lino Sanfilippo <lsanfil@marvell.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Wrong structure alignment due to compiler attribute "section"
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 11:01:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425290502-2322-1-git-send-email-lsanfil@marvell.com> (raw)
Hi,
I came across a problem concerning structure alignment on ARM architectures (in
this case the "clock_provider" struct) when structures are placed by means of the
"section" compiler attribute. I noticed that with a certain cross compiler one
byte padding is inserted in between the structures:
<snip> System.map
c074cec0 T __clk_of_table
c074cec0 t __of_table_fixed_factor_clk
c074cec0 T __stop_kprobe_blacklist
c074cf88 t __of_table_fixed_clk
c074d050 t __of_table_gpio_gate_clk
c074d118 t __of_table_mv88f6180_clk
c074d1e0 t __of_table_kirkwood_clk
c074d2a8 t __clk_of_table_sentinel
<snap>
As one can see the difference between the adresses are 200 bytes although a
clock_provider only is 196 bytes in size.
The problem is that in of_clk_init() the __clk_of_table is used as the base of
an array. Due to the padding the values in all array elements but the first one
are corruped. However with another cross compiler I could not trigger this. So
this issue seems to be compiler/linker dependent. With the attached patch
applied the layout is correct:
c074ce58 T __clk_of_table
c074ce58 t __of_table_fixed_factor_clk
c074ce58 T __stop_kprobe_blacklist
c074cf1c t __of_table_fixed_clk
c074cfe0 t __of_table_gpio_gate_clk
c074d0a4 t __of_table_mv88f6180_clk
c074d168 t __of_table_kirkwood_clk
c074d22c t __clk_of_table_sentinel
I can trigger the issue with this compiler:
wget http://www.plugcomputer.org/405/us/gplugd/tool-chain/arm-marvell-linux-gnueabi.tar.bz2
Note that this issue popped up some years ago for x86 too:
http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0706.2/2552.html
I am not sure that this is the right fix though, thats why I sent that as an
RFC.
Regards,
Lino
Lino Sanfilippo (1):
ARM: Ensure correct structure alignment when using compiler attribute
"section"
include/linux/compiler.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2015-03-02 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-02 10:01 Lino Sanfilippo [this message]
2015-03-02 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] ARM: Ensure correct structure alignment when using " Lino Sanfilippo
2015-03-03 14:41 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] Wrong structure alignment due to " Dave Martin
2015-03-04 11:40 ` sanfilippo
2015-03-04 14:35 ` Dave Martin
2015-03-04 16:29 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2015-03-05 12:26 ` Dave Martin
2015-03-05 13:20 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2015-03-05 13:47 ` Dave Martin
2015-03-05 15:32 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2015-03-05 17:33 ` Dave Martin
2015-03-06 14:02 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2015-03-06 18:20 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2015-03-22 0:56 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2015-03-24 12:07 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1425290502-2322-1-git-send-email-lsanfil@marvell.com \
--to=lsanfil@marvell.com \
--cc=LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®