mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
To: <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>, <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: <lizefan@huawei.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] kprobes: x86: cleanup __recover_probed_insn().
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 14:39:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425364776-5833-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> (raw)

Since kernel kconfig forbids turning off KPROBES_ON_FTRACE for x86, we
don't need to consider the situation that a kprobe probing on a ftrace
location. The only exception should be early kprobe with
KPROBES_ON_FTRACE enabled. However, it is still impossible for it to get
a tainted by ftrace if it is registered before ftrace is ready.

Thus this patch removes unneed logic to make code simpler.

Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 62 ++++++++----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
index 4e3d5a9..88a99c0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
@@ -219,55 +219,6 @@ retry:
 	}
 }
 
-static unsigned long
-__recover_probed_insn(kprobe_opcode_t *buf, unsigned long addr)
-{
-	struct kprobe *kp;
-	unsigned long faddr;
-
-	kp = get_kprobe((void *)addr);
-	faddr = ftrace_location(addr);
-	/*
-	 * Addresses inside the ftrace location are refused by
-	 * arch_check_ftrace_location(). Something went terribly wrong
-	 * if such an address is checked here.
-	 */
-	if (WARN_ON(faddr && faddr != addr))
-		return 0UL;
-	/*
-	 * Use the current code if it is not modified by Kprobe
-	 * and it cannot be modified by ftrace.
-	 */
-	if (!kp && !faddr)
-		return addr;
-
-	/*
-	 * Basically, kp->ainsn.insn has an original instruction.
-	 * However, RIP-relative instruction can not do single-stepping
-	 * at different place, __copy_instruction() tweaks the displacement of
-	 * that instruction. In that case, we can't recover the instruction
-	 * from the kp->ainsn.insn.
-	 *
-	 * On the other hand, in case on normal Kprobe, kp->opcode has a copy
-	 * of the first byte of the probed instruction, which is overwritten
-	 * by int3. And the instruction at kp->addr is not modified by kprobes
-	 * except for the first byte, we can recover the original instruction
-	 * from it and kp->opcode.
-	 *
-	 * In case of Kprobes using ftrace, we do not have a copy of
-	 * the original instruction. In fact, the ftrace location might
-	 * be modified at anytime and even could be in an inconsistent state.
-	 * Fortunately, we know that the original code is the ideal 5-byte
-	 * long NOP.
-	 */
-	memcpy(buf, (void *)addr, MAX_INSN_SIZE * sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
-	if (faddr)
-		memcpy(buf, ideal_nops[NOP_ATOMIC5], 5);
-	else
-		buf[0] = kp->opcode;
-	return (unsigned long)buf;
-}
-
 /*
  * Recover the probed instruction at addr for further analysis.
  * Caller must lock kprobes by kprobe_mutex, or disable preemption
@@ -282,7 +233,18 @@ unsigned long recover_probed_instruction(kprobe_opcode_t *buf, unsigned long add
 	if (__addr != addr)
 		return __addr;
 
-	return __recover_probed_insn(buf, addr);
+	/*
+	 * If KPROBES_ON_FTRACE is off, we are not allowed probing at
+	 * ftrace location. If it is on, we should use
+	 * arm_kprobe_ftrace() and never get here.  As a result, there
+	 * is no need to care about confliction between kprobe and
+	 * ftrace. The only exception should be early kprobes. However,
+	 * for such kprobes registered before ftrace is ready, it is
+	 * impossible to get a tainted instruction; for such kprobes
+	 * registered after ftrace ready, it will use
+	 * arm_kprobe_ftrace() and won't get here.
+	 */
+	return addr;
 }
 
 /* Check if paddr is at an instruction boundary */
-- 
1.8.4


             reply	other threads:[~2015-03-03  6:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-03  6:39 Wang Nan [this message]
2015-03-03  8:21 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-03-03  8:33   ` Wang Nan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1425364776-5833-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com \
    --to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®