mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
	bobby.prani@gmail.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/20] rcu: Rework preemptible expedited bitmask handling
Date: Tue,  3 Mar 2015 09:43:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425404595-17816-13-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425404595-17816-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Currently, the rcu_node tree ->expmask bitmasks are initially set to
reflect the online CPUs.  This is pointless, because only the CPUs
preempted within RCU read-side critical sections by the preceding
synchronize_sched_expedited() need to be tracked.  This commit therefore
instead sets up these bitmasks based on the state of the ->blkd_tasks
lists.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 79376e2461c9..ce8fb810770c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -98,8 +98,7 @@ RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_preempt, 'p', call_rcu);
 static struct rcu_state *rcu_state_p = &rcu_preempt_state;
 
 static int rcu_preempted_readers_exp(struct rcu_node *rnp);
-static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
-			       bool wake);
+static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp);
 
 /*
  * Tell them what RCU they are running.
@@ -415,7 +414,7 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
 		 * then we need to report up the rcu_node hierarchy.
 		 */
 		if (!empty_exp && empty_exp_now)
-			rcu_report_exp_rnp(&rcu_preempt_state, rnp, true);
+			rcu_report_exp_rnp(&rcu_preempt_state, rnp);
 	} else {
 		local_irq_restore(flags);
 	}
@@ -626,13 +625,9 @@ static int sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(struct rcu_node *rnp)
  * recursively up the tree.  (Calm down, calm down, we do the recursion
  * iteratively!)
  *
- * Most callers will set the "wake" flag, but the task initiating the
- * expedited grace period need not wake itself.
- *
  * Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex.
  */
-static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
-			       bool wake)
+static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned long mask;
@@ -646,10 +641,8 @@ static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
 		}
 		if (rnp->parent == NULL) {
 			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
-			if (wake) {
-				smp_mb(); /* EGP done before wake_up(). */
-				wake_up(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq);
-			}
+			smp_mb(); /* EGP done before wake_up(). */
+			wake_up(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq);
 			break;
 		}
 		mask = rnp->grpmask;
@@ -663,8 +656,11 @@ static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
 
 /*
  * Snapshot the tasks blocking the newly started preemptible-RCU expedited
- * grace period for the specified rcu_node structure.  If there are no such
- * tasks, report it up the rcu_node hierarchy.
+ * grace period for the specified rcu_node structure.  If there are such
+ * tasks, set the ->exp_mask bits up the rcu_node tree.  Note that we
+ * do not set the ->exp_mask bits on the leaf rcu_node structures, because:
+ * (1) No particular CPU is blocking us and (2) A non-NULL ->exp_tasks
+ * pointer tells us that a given leaf rcu_node is blocked by some tasks.
  *
  * Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex and must exclude
  * CPU hotplug operations.
@@ -673,14 +669,27 @@ static void
 sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned long mask;
+	struct rcu_node *rnp_up;
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
 	smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
 	if (!rcu_preempt_has_tasks(rnp)) {
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
-		rcu_report_exp_rnp(rsp, rnp, false); /* No tasks, report. */
 	} else {
+		/* Propagate ->expmask bits up the rcu_node tree. */
 		rnp->exp_tasks = rnp->blkd_tasks.next;
+		rnp_up = rnp;
+		while (rnp_up->parent) {
+			mask = rnp_up->grpmask;
+			rnp_up = rnp_up->parent;
+			if (ACCESS_ONCE(rnp_up->expmask) & mask)
+				break;
+			raw_spin_lock(&rnp_up->lock); /* irqs already off */
+			smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+			rnp_up->expmask |= mask;
+			raw_spin_unlock(&rnp_up->lock); /* irqs still off */
+		}
 		rcu_initiate_boost(rnp, flags);  /* releases rnp->lock */
 	}
 }
@@ -699,7 +708,6 @@ sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
  */
 void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
 	struct rcu_state *rsp = &rcu_preempt_state;
 	unsigned long snap;
@@ -750,13 +758,9 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 	/* force all RCU readers onto ->blkd_tasks lists. */
 	synchronize_sched_expedited();
 
-	/* Initialize ->expmask for all non-leaf rcu_node structures. */
-	rcu_for_each_nonleaf_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
-		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
-		smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
-		rnp->expmask = rnp->qsmaskinit;
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
-	}
+	/* Check initial state.  Later under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU. */
+	rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp)
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp->expmask);
 
 	/* Snapshot current state of ->blkd_tasks lists. */
 	rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rsp, rnp)
-- 
1.8.1.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-03 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-03 17:41 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/20] CPU hotplug updates for v4.1 Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:42 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/20] smpboot: Add common code for notification from dying CPU Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:42   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/20] x86: Use common outgoing-CPU-notification code Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 19:17     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-03 19:42       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 20:13         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-03 21:26           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 22:06             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-03 22:31               ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-04 14:43                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-04 14:55                   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-04 15:25                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-05 21:17                       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-05 22:00                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-04 15:45                     ` David Vrabel
2015-03-04 16:10                       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-03-03 17:42   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/20] blackfin: " Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:42   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/20] metag: " Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-10 15:30     ` James Hogan
2015-03-10 16:59       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-11 11:03         ` James Hogan
2015-03-11 18:58           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/20] rcu: Consolidate offline-CPU callback initialization Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/20] rcu: Put all orphan-callback-related code under same comment Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/20] rcu: Simplify sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init() Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/20] rcu: Eliminate empty HOTPLUG_CPU ifdef Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/20] rcu: Detect stalls caused by failure to propagate up rcu_node tree Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/20] rcu: Provide diagnostic option to slow down grace-period initialization Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-04 10:54     ` Paul Bolle
2015-03-04 14:59       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/20] rcutorture: Enable slow grace-period initializations Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/20] rcu: Remove event tracing from rcu_cpu_notify(), used by offline CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/20] rcu: Move rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp() to common code Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/20] rcu: Process offlining and onlining only at grace-period start Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/20] rcu: Eliminate ->onoff_mutex from rcu_node structure Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/20] cpu: Make CPU-offline idle-loop transition point more precise Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/20] rcu: Handle outgoing CPUs on exit from idle loop Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/20] rcutorture: Default to grace-period-initialization delays Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-03 17:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/20] rcu: Add diagnostics to grace-period cleanup Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1425404595-17816-13-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®