From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755406AbbCDEtV (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2015 23:49:21 -0500 Received: from numascale.com ([213.162.240.84]:38391 "EHLO numascale.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751441AbbCDEtU (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2015 23:49:20 -0500 From: Daniel J Blueman To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Daniel J Blueman , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steffen Persvold Subject: [PATCH v3] x86: Fix sibling map with NumaChip Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 12:48:31 +0800 Message-Id: <1425444511-22450-1-git-send-email-daniel@numascale.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cpanel21.proisp.no X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - numascale.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cpanel21.proisp.no: authenticated_id: daniel@numascale.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On NumaChip systems, the physical processor ID assignment wasn't accounting for the number of nodes in AMD multi-module processors, giving an incorrect sibling map: $ cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu29/topology $ grep . * core_id:5 core_siblings:00000000,ff000000 core_siblings_list:24-31 physical_package_id:3 thread_siblings:00000000,30000000 thread_siblings_list:28-29 After fixing: core_id:5 core_siblings:00000000,ffff0000 core_siblings_list:16-31 physical_package_id:1 thread_siblings:00000000,30000000 thread_siblings_list:28-29 v2: Fix to check for MSR availability before use, as per Boris's feedback v3: Test against boot cpu features to correct behaviour on larger systems with global IO Candidate for stable. Signed-off-by: Daniel J Blueman --- arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c index c2fd21f..c1f4f36 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c @@ -37,10 +37,12 @@ static const struct apic apic_numachip; static unsigned int get_apic_id(unsigned long x) { unsigned long value; - unsigned int id; + unsigned int id = (x >> 24) & 0xff; - rdmsrl(MSR_FAM10H_NODE_ID, value); - id = ((x >> 24) & 0xffU) | ((value << 2) & 0xff00U); + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR)) { + rdmsrl(MSR_FAM10H_NODE_ID, value); + id |= (value << 2) & 0xff00; + } return id; } @@ -155,10 +157,18 @@ static int __init numachip_probe(void) static void fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node) { - if (c->phys_proc_id != node) { - c->phys_proc_id = node; - per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, smp_processor_id()) = node; + u64 val; + u32 nodes = 1; + + this_cpu_write(cpu_llc_id, node); + + /* Account for nodes per socket in multi-core-module processors */ + if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR)) { + rdmsrl(MSR_FAM10H_NODE_ID, val); + nodes = ((val >> 3) & 7) + 1; } + + c->phys_proc_id = node / nodes; } static int __init numachip_system_init(void) -- 1.9.1