From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932769AbbCDKBr (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2015 05:01:47 -0500 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.184]:40520 "EHLO mailgw02.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932624AbbCDKBo (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2015 05:01:44 -0500 X-Listener-Flag: 11101 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: mediatek: Add config option for mt8173. From: Yingjoe Chen To: Arnd Bergmann CC: Mark Rutland , , Vladimir Murzin , Russell King , Hongzhou Yang , Catalin Marinas , Linus Walleij , , , , Rob Herring , , Sascha Hauer , Matthias Brugger , , , In-Reply-To: <2108883.zjHYNOn4mC@wuerfel> References: <1422342836-27689-1-git-send-email-hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com> <20150225111107.GA29206@localhost> <1425436267.21342.39.camel@mtksdaap41> <2108883.zjHYNOn4mC@wuerfel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:01:29 +0800 Message-ID: <1425463289.21342.41.camel@mtksdaap41> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 10:53 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 04 March 2015 10:31:07 Yingjoe Chen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Since we support devicetree, we don't need MACH_* to build a working > > kernel. This is true even for our v7 soc. We intend to use it to reduce > > numbers of drivers in product kernel binary. > > Most drivers are shared among the same SoCs family, but some are not. > > Currently for pinctrl driver, we are doing this so user don't need to > > select them one by one: > > > > config PINCTRL_MT8173 > > def_bool MACH_MT8173 > > select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON > > > > Alternatively, we could add these MACH_* to some other places, eg, > > drivers/soc/mediatek. Or we don't add MACH_* at all, and have all > > drivers export their own Kconfig option. User will need to select each > > of them one-by-one. > > > > What do you think? > > I would rather see these as user-selectable options, which has the > other benefit of giving compile-time coverage. For your example, > I'd suggest doing > > config PINCTRL_MT8173 > bool "Mediatek MT8173 pin control" > depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST > select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON > help > ... a useful description ... > OK, I'll send a new patch to do this. Thanks. Joe.C