From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1945991AbbCFKYa (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2015 05:24:30 -0500 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:44620 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933151AbbCFKAd (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2015 05:00:33 -0500 From: Luis Henriques To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Cc: Martin Petersen , Christoph Hellwig , Nicholas Bellinger , Luis Henriques Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 121/183] target: Check for LBA + sectors wrap-around in sbc_parse_cdb Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 09:56:52 +0000 Message-Id: <1425635874-19087-122-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4 In-Reply-To: <1425635874-19087-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> References: <1425635874-19087-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 3.16 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.7-ckt8 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Nicholas Bellinger commit aa179935edea9a64dec4b757090c8106a3907ffa upstream. This patch adds a check to sbc_parse_cdb() in order to detect when an LBA + sector vs. end-of-device calculation wraps when the LBA is sufficently large enough (eg: 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF). Cc: Martin Petersen Cc: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques --- drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c b/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c index efd0a98313fb..ccddbd1d97ed 100644 --- a/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c @@ -967,7 +967,8 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops) unsigned long long end_lba; check_lba: end_lba = dev->transport->get_blocks(dev) + 1; - if (cmd->t_task_lba + sectors > end_lba) { + if (((cmd->t_task_lba + sectors) < cmd->t_task_lba) || + ((cmd->t_task_lba + sectors) > end_lba)) { pr_err("cmd exceeds last lba %llu " "(lba %llu, sectors %u)\n", end_lba, cmd->t_task_lba, sectors);