From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752864AbbCITyF (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2015 15:54:05 -0400 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews08.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.13]:58136 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews08.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751542AbbCITyC (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2015 15:54:02 -0400 Message-ID: <1425930838.2317.46.camel@tiscali.nl> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] pinctrl: cygnus: add initial IOMUX driver support From: Paul Bolle To: Ray Jui Cc: Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Stephen Warren , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Grant Likely , Christian Daudt , Matt Porter , Florian Fainelli , Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , Scott Branden , Dmitry Torokhov , Anatol Pomazau , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , bcm-kernel-feedback-list , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 20:53:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <54FDF72E.2010806@broadcom.com> References: <1425515756-321-1-git-send-email-rjui@broadcom.com> <1425515756-321-4-git-send-email-rjui@broadcom.com> <1425542612.24292.180.camel@x220> <1425926456.2317.13.camel@tiscali.nl> <54FDEDBA.1070404@broadcom.com> <1425929442.2317.39.camel@tiscali.nl> <54FDF72E.2010806@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 (3.12.11-1.fc21) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Mar 2015 19:53:58.0759 (UTC) FILETIME=[C86DDF70:01D05AA2] X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ray Jui schreef op ma 09-03-2015 om 12:40 [-0700]: > I don't see this as an "issue" to be quite honest. (Off topic: is issue a, well, strong word? To my (non-English) mind it's rather neutral, carrying by itself less urgency than, say, problem. If I'm wrong I might have confused quite a few people by using it quite often. And that would be a real issue!) > By saying that, I at > least agree with you that these are not information that's mandatory to > be in the driver given what we already have. MODULE_LICENSE is covered > by license header. MODULE_DESCRIPTION is covered by descriptions in > Kconfig. MODULE_AUTHOR is much less important than what's in the > MAINTAINERS list. > > Since I have to submit a new patch series to address the "ngpios" issue > that Linus mentioned in the other email, I don't mind removing all these > MODULE_* macros in the driver all together. I see. Thanks, Paul Bolle