On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 14:36 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > Perhaps this should be folded into the hibernation_available check > instead of added as an "||" check here? That would end up covering in-kernel hibernation as well, which was more than I was aiming to do. But it's plausibly a justifiable implementation at the moment. ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«�éÿŠ{ayºʇڙë,j­¢f£¢·hš�ï�êÿ‘êçz_è®(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"�ú¶m§ÿÿ¾«þG«�éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~�á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^¶m§ÿÿà ÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥