mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "M. Vefa Bicakci" <m.v.b@runbox.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com, joe@perches.com,
	Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	mail@beyermatthias.de, m.v.b@runbox.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 13/15] staging: rtl8723au: Rework two byte array comparisons
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:39:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1426739958-18949-14-git-send-email-m.v.b@runbox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426739958-18949-1-git-send-email-m.v.b@runbox.com>

Prior to this commit, rtl8723au's rtw_security.c had two instances of
byte array comparisons (for CRC checks) where the individual elements
of the byte arrays were compared one by one and an error trace would
be output if the byte arrays were determined to be different.

This commit improves the readability of the CRC verification by
placing the individual 4 bytes of each byte array into an 32-bit
unsigned integer and comparing the two resulting integers.

Thanks to Larry Finger for spotting the code style issues in the
previous version of this commit, and thanks to Joe Perches for
suggesting the use of 32-bit integer comparisons instead of byte
array comparisons.

v2: Correct code style issues and compare 32-bit integers instead of
    byte arrays. Update the commit message to better reflect the nature
    of the changes.

Signed-off-by: M. Vefa Bicakci <m.v.b@runbox.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_security.c | 39 ++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_security.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_security.c
index 4330479ee0..eb3544866a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_security.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_security.c
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ void rtw_wep_decrypt23a(struct rtw_adapter *padapter,
 		     struct recv_frame *precvframe)
 {
 	/*  exclude ICV */
-	u8 crc[4];
+	u32 actual_crc, expected_crc;
 	struct arc4context mycontext;
 	int length;
 	u32 keylength;
@@ -243,19 +243,14 @@ void rtw_wep_decrypt23a(struct rtw_adapter *padapter,
 	arcfour_encrypt(&mycontext, payload, payload, length);
 
 	/* calculate icv and compare the icv */
-	*((u32 *)crc) = le32_to_cpu(getcrc32(payload, length - 4));
+	actual_crc = le32_to_cpu(getcrc32(payload, length - 4));
+	expected_crc = le32_to_cpu(get_unaligned_le32(&payload[length - 4]));
 
-	if (crc[3] != payload[length - 1] || crc[2] != payload[length - 2] ||
-	    crc[1] != payload[length - 3] || crc[0] != payload[length - 4]) {
+	if (actual_crc != expected_crc) {
 		RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_security_c_, _drv_err_,
-			 ("rtw_wep_decrypt23a:icv error crc[3](%x)!= payload"
-			  "[length-1](%x) || crc[2](%x)!= payload[length-2](%x)"
-			  " || crc[1](%x)!= payload[length-3](%x) || crc[0](%x)"
-			  "!= payload[length-4](%x)\n",
-			  crc[3], payload[length - 1],
-			  crc[2], payload[length - 2],
-			  crc[1], payload[length - 3],
-			  crc[0], payload[length - 4]));
+			 ("rtw_wep_decrypt23a:icv CRC mismatch: "
+			  "actual: %08x, expected: %08x\n",
+			  actual_crc, expected_crc));
 	}
 }
 
@@ -702,7 +697,7 @@ int rtw_tkip_decrypt23a(struct rtw_adapter *padapter,
 	u32 pnh;
 	u8 rc4key[16];
 	u8 ttkey[16];
-	u8 crc[4];
+	u32 actual_crc, expected_crc;
 	struct arc4context mycontext;
 	int length;
 	u32 prwskeylen;
@@ -757,20 +752,14 @@ int rtw_tkip_decrypt23a(struct rtw_adapter *padapter,
 	arcfour_init(&mycontext, rc4key, 16);
 	arcfour_encrypt(&mycontext, payload, payload, length);
 
-	*((u32 *)crc) = le32_to_cpu(getcrc32(payload, length - 4));
+	actual_crc = le32_to_cpu(getcrc32(payload, length - 4));
+	expected_crc = le32_to_cpu(get_unaligned_le32(&payload[length - 4]));
 
-	if (crc[3] != payload[length - 1] || crc[2] != payload[length - 2] ||
-	    crc[1] != payload[length - 3] || crc[0] != payload[length - 4]) {
+	if (actual_crc != expected_crc) {
 		RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_security_c_, _drv_err_,
-			 ("rtw_wep_decrypt23a:icv error "
-			  "crc[3](%x)!= payload[length-1](%x) || "
-			  "crc[2](%x)!= payload[length-2](%x) || "
-			  "crc[1](%x)!= payload[length-3](%x) || "
-			  "crc[0](%x)!= payload[length-4](%x)\n",
-			  crc[3], payload[length - 1],
-			  crc[2], payload[length - 2],
-			  crc[1], payload[length - 3],
-			  crc[0], payload[length - 4]));
+			 ("rtw_wep_decrypt23a:icv CRC mismatch: "
+			  "actual: %08x, expected: %08x\n",
+			  actual_crc, expected_crc));
 		res = _FAIL;
 	}
 
-- 
2.1.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-19  4:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-19  4:39 [PATCH v3 00/15] checkpatch clean-up of rtl8723au's rtw_security.c M. Vefa Bicakci
2015-03-19  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] staging: rtl8723au: Reformat whitespace to increase readability M. Vefa Bicakci
2015-03-26 12:18   ` Greg KH
2015-03-28 12:39     ` M. Vefa Bicakci
2015-03-19  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] staging: rtl8723au: Fix "before/around/after" whitespace issues M. Vefa Bicakci
2015-03-19  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] staging: rtl8723au: else should follow close brace M. Vefa Bicakci
2015-03-19  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] staging: rtl8723au: Fix the indentation of two lines M. Vefa Bicakci
2015-03-19  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] staging: rtl8723au: Reorganize a few functions to remove indentation M. Vefa Bicakci
2015-03-19  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] staging: rtl8723au: else is not generally useful after a return M. Vefa Bicakci
2015-03-19  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] staging: rtl8723au: Remove unneeded curly braces M. Vefa Bicakci
2015-03-19  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] staging: rtl8723au: trailing statements should be on next line M. Vefa Bicakci
2015-03-19  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] staging: rtl8723au: that open brace should be on the previous line M. Vefa Bicakci
2015-03-19  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] staging: rtl8723au: No spaces at the start of a line M. Vefa Bicakci
2015-03-19  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] staging: rtl8723au: Adjust whitespace in and around comments M. Vefa Bicakci
2015-03-19  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] staging: rtl8723au: suspect code indent for conditional statements M. Vefa Bicakci
2015-03-19  4:39 ` M. Vefa Bicakci [this message]
2015-03-19  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] staging: rtl8723au: Use __func__ in trace logs M. Vefa Bicakci
2015-03-19  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] staging: rtl8723au: Remove unneeded comments M. Vefa Bicakci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1426739958-18949-14-git-send-email-m.v.b@runbox.com \
    --to=m.v.b@runbox.com \
    --cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mail@beyermatthias.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®