From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751032AbbCTDiP (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2015 23:38:15 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-f54.google.com ([209.85.192.54]:34807 "EHLO mail-qg0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750731AbbCTDiM (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2015 23:38:12 -0400 From: Taesoo Kim To: jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: taesoo@gatech.edu, changwoo@gatech.edu, sanidhya@gatech.edu, blee@gatech.edu, csong84@gatech.edu, Taesoo Kim Subject: [PATCH 1/1] udf: block-based fs should use generic_write_end() Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 23:37:59 -0400 Message-Id: <1426822679-18076-1-git-send-email-tsgatesv@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.3.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org simple_write_end() is for non-block fs, which doesn't invoke mark_inode_dirty(). Instead, generic_write_end() correctly handles such case when i_size has changed. Signed-off-by: Taesoo Kim --- fs/udf/file.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/udf/file.c b/fs/udf/file.c index 08f3555..28b1dab 100644 --- a/fs/udf/file.c +++ b/fs/udf/file.c @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ const struct address_space_operations udf_adinicb_aops = { .readpage = udf_adinicb_readpage, .writepage = udf_adinicb_writepage, .write_begin = udf_adinicb_write_begin, - .write_end = simple_write_end, + .write_end = generic_write_end, .direct_IO = udf_adinicb_direct_IO, }; -- 2.3.3