mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
To: Tom Oehser <tom@toms.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: module choices affecting base kernel size???
Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 09:58:21 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1427.1020383901@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 02 May 2002 10:49:41 -0400." <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205021043200.8024-100000@conn6m.toms.net>

On Thu, 2 May 2002 10:49:41 -0400 (EDT), 
Tom Oehser <tom@toms.net> wrote:
>Changing all =m to =n in my config makes a 4K difference in the kernel size.
>
>But, the kernel compiled with them off still seems to load the modules fine.
>
>Why is there such a size difference in the static part and what do I risk if
>I mix a kernel compiled with the modules off with said modules?  What stuff
>is actually being compiled into the static part because of the modules I
>choose?  Doesn't it defeat the point of modules to have dependencies or even
>effects on the static part caused by the choice of module compilation?

The majority of modules have no effect on kernel size but some modules
require base kernel code as well.  This is typically common code or low
level setup functions.  You will find that those modules will not load
now or will break.


  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-02 23:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-02 14:49 Tom Oehser
2002-05-02 23:58 ` Keith Owens [this message]
2002-05-03  0:57   ` Tom Oehser
2002-05-03  0:01     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-03  1:28     ` Keith Owens
2002-05-03 15:03     ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1427.1020383901@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au \
    --to=kaos@ocs.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom@toms.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®