From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753534AbbDAFHh (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 01:07:37 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0236.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.236]:47325 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752134AbbDAFHg (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 01:07:36 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1537:1567:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3865:3867:3871:3872:3873:3874:4321:5007:6261:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: joke28_7c31051e5b43d X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1683 Message-ID: <1427864852.18175.53.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Custom printk format specifier for device node From: Joe Perches To: Grant Likely Cc: Pantelis Antoniou , Andrew Morton , Rob Herring , Randy Dunlap , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:07:32 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20150401045231.70614C4082F@trevor.secretlab.ca> References: <1421859974-24507-1-git-send-email-pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> <1421861843.10574.23.camel@perches.com> <7EBFDD59-156A-42FB-AAF0-CE4A88219794@antoniou-consulting.com> <20150330190432.42192C40A67@trevor.secretlab.ca> <8421E7C5-C0D9-4C86-AA37-F6507B3BCC57@konsulko.com> <20150401045231.70614C4082F@trevor.secretlab.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10-0ubuntu1~14.10.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 21:52 -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > Thinking about this more, I'd like to suggest a different format that > gives us a nice hack on the name that makes it easy to remember: > '%pOF[...]' > 'O' still means 'object', but it is also overloaded for Open Firmware. > That still leaves %pO? for other object types. What do you think? I think that's fine.