From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Darren Hart <darren@dvhart.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
fredrik.markstrom@windriver.com,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] futex: avoid double wake up in futex_wake() on -RT
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 20:02:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1428894155.16668.6.camel@stgolabs.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150410161135.GF3057@linutronix.de>
On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 18:11 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> This patch delays the wakeup of the process untill
^^^ until
> the hb->lock is
> dropped to avoid boosting + context switch to obtain the lock.
Doing the wakeups while holding the lock is also a general performance
issue for futex_wake. The problem being dealing with spurious wakeups
(wacky drivers), which makes no difference wrt nr_wake.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-13 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-07 15:03 improve futex on -RT by avoiding the double wake-up Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-04-07 15:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] futex: avoid double wake up in PI futex wait / wake on -RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-04-07 18:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-04-10 14:42 ` [PATCH 1/3 v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-04-07 15:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] futex: avoid double wake up in futex_wake() " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-04-07 19:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-04-10 16:11 ` [PATCH 2/3 v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-04-13 3:02 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2015-04-16 5:09 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-04-16 9:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-04-16 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-16 10:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-04-16 14:42 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-04-16 15:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-16 16:22 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-04-07 15:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] ipc/mqueue: remove STATE_PENDING Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-04-07 17:48 ` Manfred Spraul
2015-04-07 18:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-04-10 14:37 ` [PATCH v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-04-23 22:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-04-28 3:24 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-04-28 12:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 16:36 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-04-28 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 16:59 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-04-29 19:44 ` Manfred Spraul
2015-04-30 18:46 ` Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1428894155.16668.6.camel@stgolabs.net \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=fredrik.markstrom@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome