From: kan.liang@intel.com
To: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] perf/x86/intel: Fix SLM cache event list
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 05:34:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1429608881-5055-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> (raw)
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
iTLB-load-misses and LLC-load-misses count wrong on SLM.
There is no ITLB.MISSES support on SLM. Event PAGE_WALKS.I_SIDE_WALK
should be used to count iTLB-load-misses. This event counts when an
instruction (I) page walk is completed or started. Since a page walk
implies a TLB miss, the number of TLB misses can be counted by counting
the number of pagewalks.
DMND_DATA_RD counts both demand and DCU prefetch data reads. However,
LLC-load-misses should only count demand read. There is no way to not
include prefetches with single counter on SLM. So the LLC-load-misses
support should be removed on SLM.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 219d3fb..dab4257 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@ static __initconst const u64 slm_hw_cache_extra_regs
[ C(LL ) ] = {
[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = SLM_DMND_READ|SLM_LLC_ACCESS,
- [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = SLM_DMND_READ|SLM_LLC_MISS,
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0,
},
[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = SLM_DMND_WRITE|SLM_LLC_ACCESS,
@@ -1184,8 +1184,7 @@ static __initconst const u64 slm_hw_cache_event_ids
[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
/* OFFCORE_RESPONSE.ANY_DATA.LOCAL_CACHE */
[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x01b7,
- /* OFFCORE_RESPONSE.ANY_DATA.ANY_LLC_MISS */
- [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x01b7,
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0,
},
[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
/* OFFCORE_RESPONSE.ANY_RFO.LOCAL_CACHE */
@@ -1217,7 +1216,7 @@ static __initconst const u64 slm_hw_cache_event_ids
[ C(ITLB) ] = {
[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x00c0, /* INST_RETIRED.ANY_P */
- [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x0282, /* ITLB.MISSES */
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x40205, /* PAGE_WALKS.I_SIDE_WALKS */
},
[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = -1,
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2015-04-21 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-21 9:34 kan.liang [this message]
2015-05-08 13:20 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1429608881-5055-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®