From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry/64: better check for canonical address
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:27:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1429633649-20169-1-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com> (raw)
This change makes the check exact (no more false positives
on "negative" addresses).
It isn't really important to be fully correct here -
almost all addresses we'll ever see will be userspace ones,
but OTOH it looks to be cheap enough:
the new code uses two more ALU ops but preserves %rcx,
allowing to not reload it from pt_regs->cx again.
On disassembly level, the changes are:
cmp %rcx,0x80(%rsp) -> mov 0x80(%rsp),%r11; cmp %rcx,%r11
shr $0x2f,%rcx -> shl $0x10,%rcx; sar $0x10,%rcx; cmp %rcx,%r11
mov 0x58(%rsp),%rcx -> (eliminated)
On 03/26/2015 07:45 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I suspect that the two added ALU ops are free for all practical
> purposes, and the performance of this path isn't *that* critical.
>
> If anyone is running with vsyscall=native because they need the
> performance, then this would be a big win. Otherwise I don't have a
> real preference. Anyone else have any thoughts here?
>
> Let me just run through the math quickly to make sure I believe all the numbers:
>
> Canonical addresses either start with 17 zeros or 17 ones.
>
> In the old code, we checked that the top (64-47) = 17 bits were all
> zero. We did this by shifting right by 47 bits and making sure that
> nothing was left.
>
> In the new code, we're shifting left by (64 - 48) = 16 bits and then
> signed shifting right by the same amount, this propagating the 17th
> highest bit to all positions to its left. If we get the same value we
> started with, then we're good to go.
>
> So it looks okay to me.
>
> IOW, the new code extends the optimization correctly to one more case
> (native vsyscalls or the really weird corner case of returns to
> emulated vsyscalls, although that should basically never happen) at
> the cost of two probably-free ALU ops.
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
CC: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
CC: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
CC: x86@kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
Changes since last submission: expanded commit message with Andy's reply
as requested by Ingo.
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
index 3bdfdcd..e952f6b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -410,26 +410,27 @@ syscall_return:
* a completely clean 64-bit userspace context.
*/
movq RCX(%rsp),%rcx
- cmpq %rcx,RIP(%rsp) /* RCX == RIP */
+ movq RIP(%rsp),%r11
+ cmpq %rcx,%r11 /* RCX == RIP */
jne opportunistic_sysret_failed
/*
* On Intel CPUs, SYSRET with non-canonical RCX/RIP will #GP
* in kernel space. This essentially lets the user take over
- * the kernel, since userspace controls RSP. It's not worth
- * testing for canonicalness exactly -- this check detects any
- * of the 17 high bits set, which is true for non-canonical
- * or kernel addresses. (This will pessimize vsyscall=native.
- * Big deal.)
+ * the kernel, since userspace controls RSP.
*
- * If virtual addresses ever become wider, this will need
+ * If width of "canonical tail" ever becomes variable, this will need
* to be updated to remain correct on both old and new CPUs.
*/
.ifne __VIRTUAL_MASK_SHIFT - 47
.error "virtual address width changed -- SYSRET checks need update"
.endif
- shr $__VIRTUAL_MASK_SHIFT, %rcx
- jnz opportunistic_sysret_failed
+ /* Change top 16 bits to be the sign-extension of 47th bit */
+ shl $(64 - (__VIRTUAL_MASK_SHIFT+1)), %rcx
+ sar $(64 - (__VIRTUAL_MASK_SHIFT+1)), %rcx
+ /* If this changed %rcx, it was not canonical */
+ cmpq %rcx, %r11
+ jne opportunistic_sysret_failed
cmpq $__USER_CS,CS(%rsp) /* CS must match SYSRET */
jne opportunistic_sysret_failed
@@ -466,8 +467,8 @@ syscall_return:
*/
syscall_return_via_sysret:
CFI_REMEMBER_STATE
- /* r11 is already restored (see code above) */
- RESTORE_C_REGS_EXCEPT_R11
+ /* rcx and r11 are already restored (see code above) */
+ RESTORE_C_REGS_EXCEPT_RCX_R11
movq RSP(%rsp),%rsp
USERGS_SYSRET64
CFI_RESTORE_STATE
--
1.8.1.4
next reply other threads:[~2015-04-21 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-21 16:27 Denys Vlasenko [this message]
2015-04-21 18:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-23 15:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-23 15:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-23 15:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-23 15:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-22 14:11 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry/64: Implement better check for canonical addresses tip-bot for Denys Vlasenko
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-03-26 12:42 [PATCH] x86/asm/entry/64: better check for canonical address Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-26 18:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-27 8:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-30 14:27 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-30 14:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-30 14:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-27 8:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-27 10:45 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-27 11:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-27 11:28 ` Brian Gerst
2015-03-27 11:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-27 12:14 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-27 12:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-27 12:31 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-28 9:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-29 19:36 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-29 21:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-29 21:46 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-31 16:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-31 17:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-31 17:31 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-27 11:27 ` Brian Gerst
2015-03-27 11:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-27 21:37 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-04-02 17:37 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-02 18:10 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1429633649-20169-1-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--to=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®