From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S966292AbbDWOSh (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:18:37 -0400
Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.22]:49440 "EHLO
	lb1-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966272AbbDWOSe (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:18:34 -0400
Message-ID: <1429798711.2927.8.camel@x220>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] crypto: add jitterentropy RNG
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
        Andreas Steffen <andreas.steffen@strongswan.org>,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Sandy Harris <sandyinchina@gmail.com>,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:18:31 +0200
In-Reply-To: <3179693.vMYTrm5f8Q@myon.chronox.de>
References: <5054521.el7mZro33c@myon.chronox.de>
	 <5676005.EdpjbaV0S3@myon.chronox.de> <1429797908.2927.5.camel@x220>
	 <3179693.vMYTrm5f8Q@myon.chronox.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-4.fc20) 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 16:08 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Other patches that are in the kernel that I wrote (e.g. 
> the crypto/drbg.c) have the same license as above, but use 
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL") -- Thus I would think that leaving it as is should be 
> ok.

Why not submit the trivial patches to make the license comment and the
MODULE_LICENSE() macro match in those files too?

Thanks,


Paul Bolle