From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 009.lax.mailroute.net (009.lax.mailroute.net [199.89.1.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F1FD17BB11; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712770398; cv=none; b=Oh1pMwrMJjtkZrC/8y8V0EB+4yLbpgMFcEzas57G7yE5uCrWjD3iKqCTHroxDM8LA3KqOnYagIeauawtzXYMa08wl6Zx7LoUMcsgPAdTBgG/m+V2Mp/qOKLQ3FuPcycgL1P4nLQObrKHxqMqVzFdLWC5IOTs+tDYhYxgDsdbY1A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712770398; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7DCCoIyxsXacknpZFdopPKDgHWQ9x05lFhZzasgtMS8=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=icu8vuCMtBhugieqVS+adsza22QC7CPZ63eaazxDbITqOnrm7GVh9gzsrufSmL4AYb8jpnMAbHxwXNzI7aHOT1tIus3Rt6IAXBe+Kno0OUkN2bVg2OVdZDD8vl0/+ft8o5StAqP9poGO+t8CIotuagokv6zJd3VY/E7vH6Z+H0Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=Y7zAhBKb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="Y7zAhBKb" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 009.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VF90C5lg0zlgVnF; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:33:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:references:content-language:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1712770393; x=1715362394; bh=rqxi/coHGo0Z4+SzPbCxYqpb cGK9u0kiEw9R4geXub8=; b=Y7zAhBKbHP6IiQYTSQpgBmcfWU/3s/uaG46h4Qch XomHgRSiE/gGhKaz0WecgL2EQkanQR/se2w1NvKUtdTTYXvJe3k1U+L0WrzFyeH8 hs46hMPUExOlYukFcyyH+sonDb/VOgpL6qKoW3/G4v+qZcjNxAOPgCjXC4pEt7ED g/kzf6+y9ZQFktiEQ4qB18DQtZdRHbbBO/XMo7aF8KPKh7S/xxtgvqr/7fw3n/3L QUWTKmp2BkhEjMYPCUXvZFegLQc1ErAb0RqEHwAcJZ8qAhkBz6SzOWKD4ex+hz7v EuhJ4iIU5x6vwE/XsYEjvokrEDDeXprDTjiZPbTk0ILq4Q== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 009.lax.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (009.lax [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id skNfnrtP5XgF; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.125.77.89] (unknown [104.132.0.89]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 009.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4VF9075wBhzlgTsK; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <142b9606-8871-445a-afa6-6b056b82654f@acm.org> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:33:10 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] scsi: ufs: Remove support for old UFSHCI versions Content-Language: en-US To: Avri Altman , "James E . J . Bottomley" , "Martin K . Petersen" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Bean Huo , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20240407060412.856-1-avri.altman@wdc.com> <20240407060412.856-2-avri.altman@wdc.com> From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <20240407060412.856-2-avri.altman@wdc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 4/6/24 23:04, Avri Altman wrote: > UFS spec version 2.1 was published more than 10 years ago. It is > vanishingly unlikely that even there are out there platforms that uses > earlier host controllers, let alone that those ancient platforms will > ever run a V6.10 kernel. To be extra cautious, leave out support for > UFSHCI2.0 as well, and just remove support of host controllers prior > to UFS2.0. "leave out" probably should be changed into "retain". Anyway: Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche