From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
bobby.prani@gmail.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] rcu: Convert from rcu_preempt_state to *rcu_state_p
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:38:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431466701-653-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431466701-653-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
It would be good to move more code from #ifdef to IS_ENABLED(), but
that does not work if the body of the IS_ENABLED() "if" statement
references a variable (such as rcu_preempt_state) that does not
exist if the IS_ENABLED() Kconfig variable is not set. This commit
therefore substitutes *rcu_state_p for all uses of rcu_preempt_state
in kernel/rcu/tree_preempt.h, which should enable elimination of
a few #ifdefs.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 19 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 58b1ebdc4387..9a04764dd239 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void)
!t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked) {
/* Possibly blocking in an RCU read-side critical section. */
- rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rcu_preempt_state.rda);
+ rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rcu_state_p->rda);
rnp = rdp->mynode;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
@@ -353,8 +353,7 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
rnp->grplo,
rnp->grphi,
!!rnp->gp_tasks);
- rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(&rcu_preempt_state,
- rnp, flags);
+ rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(rcu_state_p, rnp, flags);
} else {
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
}
@@ -370,7 +369,7 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
* then we need to report up the rcu_node hierarchy.
*/
if (!empty_exp && empty_exp_now)
- rcu_report_exp_rnp(&rcu_preempt_state, rnp, true);
+ rcu_report_exp_rnp(rcu_state_p, rnp, true);
} else {
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
@@ -500,7 +499,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(void)
static void rcu_preempt_do_callbacks(void)
{
- rcu_do_batch(&rcu_preempt_state, this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_preempt_data));
+ rcu_do_batch(rcu_state_p, this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_preempt_data));
}
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
@@ -510,7 +509,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_do_callbacks(void)
*/
void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu))
{
- __call_rcu(head, func, &rcu_preempt_state, -1, 0);
+ __call_rcu(head, func, rcu_state_p, -1, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu);
@@ -711,7 +710,7 @@ sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init2(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
{
struct rcu_node *rnp;
- struct rcu_state *rsp = &rcu_preempt_state;
+ struct rcu_state *rsp = rcu_state_p;
unsigned long snap;
int trycount = 0;
@@ -798,7 +797,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu_expedited);
*/
void rcu_barrier(void)
{
- _rcu_barrier(&rcu_preempt_state);
+ _rcu_barrier(rcu_state_p);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier);
@@ -807,7 +806,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier);
*/
static void __init __rcu_init_preempt(void)
{
- rcu_init_one(&rcu_preempt_state, &rcu_preempt_data);
+ rcu_init_one(rcu_state_p, &rcu_preempt_data);
}
/*
@@ -1172,7 +1171,7 @@ static int rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_state *rsp,
struct sched_param sp;
struct task_struct *t;
- if (&rcu_preempt_state != rsp)
+ if (rcu_state_p != rsp)
return 0;
if (!rcu_scheduler_fully_active || rcu_rnp_online_cpus(rnp) == 0)
--
1.8.1.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-12 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-12 21:37 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/15] Miscellaneous fixes for 4.2 Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 21:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/15] rcu: Convert ACCESS_ONCE() to READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 21:38 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-05-12 21:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/15] rcu: Eliminate a few RCU_BOOST #ifdefs in favor of IS_ENABLED() Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 21:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Tell the compiler that rcu_state_p is immutable Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 21:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/15] rcu: Create an immutable rcu_data_p pointer to default rcu_data structure Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 21:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/15] rcu: Eliminate a few CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL #ifdefs Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 21:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/15] rcu: Force wakeup of rcu_gp_kthread at grace-period end Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 21:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/15] rcu: tree_plugin: Use bool function return values of true/false not 1/0 Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 21:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/15] powerpc: Fix smp_mb__before_spinlock() Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 21:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/15] rcu: Fix missing task information during rcu-preempt stall Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 21:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/15] rcu: Add more debug info on "kthread starved" RCU CPU stall warnings Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 21:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/15] smp: Make control dependencies work on Alpha, improve documentation Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 21:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/15] rcu: Make synchronize_sched_expedited() call wait_rcu_gp() Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 21:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/15] rcu: Make rcu_*_data variables static Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 21:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/15] rcu: Change function declaration to bool Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1431466701-653-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome