From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
devel@linuxdriverproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: balloon: check if ha_region_mutex was acquired in MEM_CANCEL_ONLINE case
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 10:14:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1432023263-2470-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com> (raw)
Memory notifiers are being executed in a sequential order and when one of
them fails returning something different from NOTIFY_OK the remainder of
the notification chain is not being executed. When a memory block is being
onlined in online_pages() we do memory_notify(MEM_GOING_ONLINE, ) and if
one of the notifiers in the chain fails we end up doing
memory_notify(MEM_CANCEL_ONLINE, ) so it is possible for a notifier to see
MEM_CANCEL_ONLINE without seeing the corresponding MEM_GOING_ONLINE event.
E.g. when CONFIG_KASAN is enabled the kasan_mem_notifier() is being used
to prevent memory hotplug, it returns NOTIFY_BAD for all MEM_GOING_ONLINE
events. As kasan_mem_notifier() comes before the hv_memory_notifier() in
the notification chain we don't see the MEM_GOING_ONLINE event and we do
not take the ha_region_mutex. We, however, see the MEM_CANCEL_ONLINE event
and unconditionally try to release the lock, the following is observed:
[ 110.850927] =====================================
[ 110.850927] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
[ 110.850927] 4.1.0-rc3_bugxxxxxxx_test_xxxx #595 Not tainted
[ 110.850927] -------------------------------------
[ 110.850927] systemd-udevd/920 is trying to release lock
(&dm_device.ha_region_mutex) at:
[ 110.850927] [<ffffffff81acda0e>] mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10
[ 110.850927] but there are no more locks to release!
At the same time we can have the ha_region_mutex taken when we get the
MEM_CANCEL_ONLINE event in case one of the memory notifiers after the
hv_memory_notifier() in the notification chain failed so we need to add
the mutex_is_locked() check. In case of MEM_ONLINE we are always supposed
to have the mutex locked.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
---
drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c b/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c
index cb5b7dc..8a725cd 100644
--- a/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c
@@ -567,7 +567,9 @@ static int hv_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
case MEM_ONLINE:
dm_device.num_pages_onlined += mem->nr_pages;
case MEM_CANCEL_ONLINE:
- mutex_unlock(&dm_device.ha_region_mutex);
+ if (val == MEM_ONLINE ||
+ mutex_is_locked(&dm_device.ha_region_mutex))
+ mutex_unlock(&dm_device.ha_region_mutex);
if (dm_device.ha_waiting) {
dm_device.ha_waiting = false;
complete(&dm_device.ol_waitevent);
--
1.9.3
reply other threads:[~2015-05-19 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1432023263-2470-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®