mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@daterainc.com>
To: target-devel <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] target: Drop se_lun->lun_active for existing percpu lun_ref
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 07:06:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1432278417-29994-4-git-send-email-nab@daterainc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432278417-29994-1-git-send-email-nab@daterainc.com>

From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>

With se_port_t and t10_alua_tg_pt_gp_member being absored into se_lun,
there is no need for an extra atomic_t based reference count for PR
ALL_TG_PT=1 and ALUA access state transition.

Go ahead and use the existing percpu se_lun->lun_ref instead, and
convert the two special cases to percpu_ref_tryget_live() to avoid
se_lun if transport_clear_lun_ref() has already been invoked to
shutdown the se_lun.

Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
---
 drivers/target/target_core_alua.c |  5 +++--
 drivers/target/target_core_pr.c   |  9 +++++----
 drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c  | 10 ++++++----
 include/target/target_core_base.h |  1 -
 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_alua.c b/drivers/target/target_core_alua.c
index 09e89f0..1f196cb 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_alua.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_alua.c
@@ -969,7 +969,8 @@ static void core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		 * every I_T nexus other than the I_T nexus on which the SET
 		 * TARGET PORT GROUPS command
 		 */
-		atomic_inc_mb(&lun->lun_active);
+		if (!percpu_ref_tryget_live(&lun->lun_ref))
+			continue;
 		spin_unlock(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_lock);
 
 		spin_lock_bh(&lun->lun_deve_lock);
@@ -997,7 +998,7 @@ static void core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		spin_unlock_bh(&lun->lun_deve_lock);
 
 		spin_lock(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_lock);
-		atomic_dec_mb(&lun->lun_active);
+		percpu_ref_put(&lun->lun_ref);
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_lock);
 	/*
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c b/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
index 413ba16..218a003 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
@@ -702,7 +702,8 @@ static struct t10_pr_registration *__core_scsi3_alloc_registration(
 	 */
 	spin_lock(&dev->se_port_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(lun_tmp, next, &dev->dev_sep_list, lun_dev_link) {
-		atomic_inc_mb(&lun_tmp->lun_active);
+		if (!percpu_ref_tryget_live(&lun_tmp->lun_ref))
+			continue;
 		spin_unlock(&dev->se_port_lock);
 
 		spin_lock_bh(&lun_tmp->lun_deve_lock);
@@ -747,7 +748,7 @@ static struct t10_pr_registration *__core_scsi3_alloc_registration(
 			if (ret < 0) {
 				pr_err("core_scsi3_lunacl_depend"
 						"_item() failed\n");
-				atomic_dec_mb(&lun->lun_active);
+				percpu_ref_put(&lun_tmp->lun_ref);
 				kref_put(&deve_tmp->pr_kref, target_pr_kref_release);
 				goto out;
 			}
@@ -763,7 +764,7 @@ static struct t10_pr_registration *__core_scsi3_alloc_registration(
 						deve_tmp, deve_tmp->mapped_lun,
 						NULL, sa_res_key, all_tg_pt, aptpl);
 			if (!pr_reg_atp) {
-				atomic_dec_mb(&lun_tmp->lun_active);
+				percpu_ref_put(&lun_tmp->lun_ref);
 				core_scsi3_lunacl_undepend_item(deve_tmp);
 				goto out;
 			}
@@ -775,7 +776,7 @@ static struct t10_pr_registration *__core_scsi3_alloc_registration(
 		spin_unlock_bh(&lun_tmp->lun_deve_lock);
 
 		spin_lock(&dev->se_port_lock);
-		atomic_dec_mb(&lun_tmp->lun_active);
+		percpu_ref_put(&lun_tmp->lun_ref);
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&dev->se_port_lock);
 
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c b/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
index f60b74e..fb81555 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
@@ -609,7 +609,6 @@ struct se_lun *core_tpg_alloc_lun(
 	mutex_init(&lun->lun_tg_pt_md_mutex);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lun->lun_tg_pt_gp_link);
 	spin_lock_init(&lun->lun_tg_pt_gp_lock);
-	atomic_set(&lun->lun_active, 0);
 	lun->lun_tpg = tpg;
 
 	return lun;
@@ -665,13 +664,16 @@ void core_tpg_remove_lun(
 	struct se_device *dev = lun->lun_se_dev;
 
 	core_clear_lun_from_tpg(lun, tpg);
+	/*
+	 * Wait for any active I/O references to percpu se_lun->lun_ref to
+	 * be released.  Also, se_lun->lun_ref is now used by PR and ALUA
+	 * logic when referencing a remote target port during ALL_TGT_PT=1
+	 * and generating UNIT_ATTENTIONs for ALUA access state transition.
+	 */
 	transport_clear_lun_ref(lun);
 
 	mutex_lock(&tpg->tpg_lun_mutex);
 	if (lun->lun_se_dev) {
-		while (atomic_read(&lun->lun_active))
-			cpu_relax();
-
 		target_detach_tg_pt_gp(lun);
 
 		spin_lock(&dev->se_port_lock);
diff --git a/include/target/target_core_base.h b/include/target/target_core_base.h
index 6cd1452..9f3878f 100644
--- a/include/target/target_core_base.h
+++ b/include/target/target_core_base.h
@@ -727,7 +727,6 @@ struct se_lun {
 	struct t10_alua_tg_pt_gp *lun_tg_pt_gp;
 	spinlock_t		lun_tg_pt_gp_lock;
 
-	atomic_t		lun_active;
 	struct se_portal_group	*lun_tpg;
 	struct scsi_port_stats	lun_stats;
 	struct config_group	lun_group;
-- 
1.9.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-22  7:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-22  7:06 [PATCH 0/4] target: Eliminate se_port + t10_alua_tg_pt_gp_member Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-05-22  7:06 ` [PATCH 1/4] target: Subsume se_port + t10_alua_tg_pt_gp_member into se_lun Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-05-22  7:58   ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-05-22  7:06 ` [PATCH 2/4] target: Drop lun_sep_lock for se_lun->lun_se_dev RCU usage Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-05-22  7:57   ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-05-22  8:10     ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-05-22 11:56   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-25 22:59     ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-05-22  7:06 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
2015-05-22  7:58   ` [PATCH 3/4] target: Drop se_lun->lun_active for existing percpu lun_ref Hannes Reinecke
2015-05-22  7:06 ` [PATCH 4/4] target: Drop unnecessary core_tpg_register TFO parameter Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-05-22  8:00   ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1432278417-29994-4-git-send-email-nab@daterainc.com \
    --to=nab@daterainc.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®