mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>,
	peifeiyue@huawei.com, dzickus@redhat.com, morgan.wang@huawei.com,
	sasha.levin@oracle.com, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 04/10] printk: Merge and flush NMI buffer predictably via IRQ work
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 14:46:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1432557993-20458-5-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432557993-20458-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.cz>

It might take ages until users see messages from NMI context. They cannot
be flushed to the console because the operation involves taking and
releasing a bunch of locks. Everything gets fixed by the followup printk
in normal context but it is not predictable.

The same problem has printk_sched() and this patch reuses the existing
solution.

There is no special printk() variant for NMI context. Hence the IRQ work
need to get queued from vprintk_emit().

Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>
---
 kernel/printk/printk.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index bf2abdda5869..c2ae9ff388ae 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -1554,9 +1554,6 @@ int printk_deferred(const char *fmt, ...)
 	va_start(args, fmt);
 	r = vprintk_emit(0, LOGLEVEL_SCHED, NULL, 0, fmt, args);
 	va_end(args);
-
-	__this_cpu_or(printk_pending, PRINTK_PENDING_OUTPUT);
-	irq_work_queue(this_cpu_ptr(&wake_up_klogd_work));
 	preempt_enable();
 
 	return r;
@@ -1880,7 +1877,10 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk_emit(int facility, int level,
 	 * If called from the scheduler or NMI context, we can not get console
 	 * without a possible deadlock.
 	 */
-	if (!in_sched && !in_nmi()) {
+	if (in_sched || in_nmi()) {
+		__this_cpu_or(printk_pending, PRINTK_PENDING_OUTPUT);
+		irq_work_queue(this_cpu_ptr(&wake_up_klogd_work));
+	} else {
 		lockdep_off();
 		/*
 		 * Disable preemption to avoid being preempted while holding
-- 
1.8.5.6


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-25 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-25 12:46 [PATCH 00/10] printk: Avoid deadlock in NMI + vprintk_emit() cleanup Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 01/10] printk: Avoid deadlock in NMI context Petr Mladek
2015-05-27 23:13   ` Andrew Morton
2015-05-28 12:00     ` Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 02/10] printk: Try harder to get logbuf_lock on NMI Petr Mladek
2015-05-27 23:14   ` Andrew Morton
2015-05-28  7:54     ` Jiri Kosina
2015-05-28 13:50     ` Petr Mladek
2015-05-28 20:09       ` Andrew Morton
2015-05-29 10:56         ` Petr Mladek
2015-05-29 20:46           ` Andrew Morton
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 03/10] printk: Move the deferred printk stuff Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2015-05-27 23:14   ` [PATCH 04/10] printk: Merge and flush NMI buffer predictably via IRQ work Andrew Morton
2015-05-28 13:12     ` Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 05/10] printk: Try hard to print Oops message in NMI context Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 06/10] printk: Split delayed printing of warnings from vprintk_emit() Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 07/10] printk: Split text formatting and analyze " Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 08/10] printk: Detect scheduler messages in vprintk_format_and_analyze() Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 09/10] printk: Split text storing logic from vprintk_emit() Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 10/10] printk: Split console call " Petr Mladek
2015-05-29 20:50 ` [PATCH 00/10] printk: Avoid deadlock in NMI + vprintk_emit() cleanup Andrew Morton
2015-06-01 13:06   ` Jan Kara
2015-06-02  9:46     ` long.wanglong
2015-06-02  9:52       ` Jiri Kosina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1432557993-20458-5-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.cz \
    --to=pmladek@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anderson@redhat.com \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=kay@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=long.wanglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=morgan.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peifeiyue@huawei.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®