From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752171AbbE0NAh (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2015 09:00:37 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([93.93.135.160]:33992 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751587AbbE0NAe convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2015 09:00:34 -0400 Message-ID: <1432731613.2781.13.camel@collabora.co.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: cache-l2c: Detect whether it's safe to unlock From: Sjoerd Simons To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Rob Herring , Tony Lindgren , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Javier Martinez Canillas Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 15:00:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20150515113448.GI2067@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1431416355-7693-1-git-send-email-sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk> <1431416355-7693-2-git-send-email-sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk> <20150515113448.GI2067@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Organization: Collabora Ltd. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hey Russell, On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 12:34 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:39:14AM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > > To handle that, for caches where special configuration is needed to allow > > unlocking, check whether this has been setup before unlocking. > > I've come up with a different solution to this, which of course I prefer. > I'll post the patches later today, thanks. Did you get round to create/posting those patches? If not, i'm happy to do a set with your suggested solution as well if you can point me in the right direction :) -- Sjoerd Simons Collabora Ltd.