mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hp.com>,
	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/qrwlock: Don't contend with readers when setting _QW_WAITING
Date: Tue,  9 Jun 2015 11:19:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1433863153-30722-3-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433863153-30722-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com>

The current cmpxchg() loop in setting the _QW_WAITING flag for writers
in queue_write_lock_slowpath() will contend with incoming readers
causing possibly extra cmpxchg() operations that are wasteful. This
patch changes the code to do a byte cmpxchg() to eliminate contention
with new readers.

A multithreaded microbenchmark running 5M read_lock/write_lock loop
on a 8-socket 80-core Westmere-EX machine running 4.0 based kernel
with the qspinlock patch have the following execution times (in ms)
with and without the patch:

With R:W ratio = 5:1

	Threads	   w/o patch	with patch	% change
	-------	   ---------	----------	--------
	   2	     990 	    895		  -9.6%
	   3	    2136 	   1912		 -10.5%
	   4	    3166	   2830		 -10.6%
	   5	    3953	   3629		  -8.2%
	   6	    4628	   4405		  -4.8%
	   7	    5344	   5197		  -2.8%
	   8	    6065	   6004		  -1.0%
	   9	    6826	   6811		  -0.2%
	  10	    7599	   7599		   0.0%
	  15	    9757	   9766		  +0.1%
	  20	   13767	  13817		  +0.4%

With small number of contending threads, this patch can improve
locking performance by up to 10%. With more contending threads,
however, the gain diminishes.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
---
 kernel/locking/qrwlock.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
index d7d7557..559198a 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
@@ -22,6 +22,26 @@
 #include <linux/hardirq.h>
 #include <asm/qrwlock.h>
 
+/*
+ * This internal data structure is used for optimizing access to some of
+ * the subfields within the atomic_t cnts.
+ */
+struct __qrwlock {
+	union {
+		atomic_t cnts;
+		struct {
+#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+			u8 wmode;	/* Writer mode   */
+			u8 rcnts[3];	/* Reader counts */
+#else
+			u8 rcnts[3];	/* Reader counts */
+			u8 wmode;	/* Writer mode   */
+#endif
+		};
+	};
+	arch_spinlock_t	lock;
+};
+
 /**
  * rspin_until_writer_unlock - inc reader count & spin until writer is gone
  * @lock  : Pointer to queue rwlock structure
@@ -109,10 +129,10 @@ void queue_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
 	 * or wait for a previous writer to go away.
 	 */
 	for (;;) {
-		cnts = atomic_read(&lock->cnts);
-		if (!(cnts & _QW_WMASK) &&
-		    (atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->cnts, cnts,
-				    cnts | _QW_WAITING) == cnts))
+		struct __qrwlock *l = (struct __qrwlock *)lock;
+
+		if (!READ_ONCE(l->wmode) &&
+		   (cmpxchg(&l->wmode, 0, _QW_WAITING) == 0))
 			break;
 
 		cpu_relax_lowlatency();
-- 
1.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-06-09 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-09 15:19 [PATCH 0/2 v2] locking/qrwlock: Fix interrupt handling problem Waiman Long
2015-06-09 15:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] locking/qrwlock: Fix bug in interrupt handling code Waiman Long
2015-06-11 14:21   ` Will Deacon
2015-06-13  3:16     ` Waiman Long
2015-06-09 15:19 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2015-06-10  7:35   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/qrwlock: Don't contend with readers when setting _QW_WAITING Ingo Molnar
2015-06-10 16:28     ` Waiman Long
2015-06-12  8:45       ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-12 22:58         ` Waiman Long
2015-06-19 17:59   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/qrwlock: Don' t " tip-bot for Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1433863153-30722-3-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com \
    --to=waiman.long@hp.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=doug.hatch@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®