mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] sched:Fix task_numa_migrate to always update preferred node
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:26:01 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1434455762-30857-4-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434455762-30857-1-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

In task_numa_migrate(), env.dst_nid points to either a preferred node or
a node that has free capacity and has more task weight than the current
node.

Currently in such a scenario, there are checks to see if tasks in the
numa_group have previously run on the node that has free capacity before
updating the preferred node. Commit (c1ceac62: "sched/numa: Reduce
conflict between fbq_classify_rq() and migration") gives preferance to
preferred node while load balancing.  Hence if setting the
preferred_node after evaluating is skipped, then the task might miss
opportunity later at load balancing time to move to the preferred node.

In such a scenario, it makes sense to unconditionally set env.dst_nid as
the preferred node unless the said node is already the preferred node.

While here, update env.dst_nid only when both task and groups benefit.
This is as per the comment in the code.

Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 11 ++---------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 7b23efa..d1aa374 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1503,7 +1503,7 @@ static int task_numa_migrate(struct task_struct *p)
 			/* Only consider nodes where both task and groups benefit */
 			taskimp = task_weight(p, nid, dist) - taskweight;
 			groupimp = group_weight(p, nid, dist) - groupweight;
-			if (taskimp < 0 && groupimp < 0)
+			if (taskimp < 0 || groupimp < 0)
 				continue;
 
 			env.dist = dist;
@@ -1519,16 +1519,9 @@ static int task_numa_migrate(struct task_struct *p)
 	 * and is migrating into one of the workload's active nodes, remember
 	 * this node as the task's preferred numa node, so the workload can
 	 * settle down.
-	 * A task that migrated to a second choice node will be better off
-	 * trying for a better one later. Do not set the preferred node here.
 	 */
 	if (p->numa_group) {
-		if (env.best_cpu == -1)
-			nid = env.src_nid;
-		else
-			nid = env.dst_nid;
-
-		if (node_isset(nid, p->numa_group->active_nodes))
+		if (env.dst_nid != p->numa_preferred_nid)
 			sched_setnuma(p, env.dst_nid);
 	}
 
-- 
1.8.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-06-16 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-16 11:55 [PATCH v2 0/4] Improve numa load balancing Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-16 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] sched/tip:Prefer numa hotness over cache hotness Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-06 15:50   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Prefer NUMA " tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07  0:19     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-08 13:31       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07  6:49   ` tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-16 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] sched:Consider imbalance_pct when comparing loads in numa_has_capacity Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-16 14:39   ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-22 16:29     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-23  1:18       ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-23  8:10       ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-23 13:01         ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-23 14:36           ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-06 15:50   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Consider 'imbalance_pct' when comparing loads in numa_has_capacity() tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07  6:49   ` tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-16 11:56 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2015-06-16 14:54   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] sched:Fix task_numa_migrate to always update preferred node Rik van Riel
2015-06-16 17:19     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-16 18:25       ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-16 17:18   ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-16 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] sched:Use correct nid while evaluating task weights Srikar Dronamraju
2015-06-16 15:00   ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-16 17:26     ` Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1434455762-30857-4-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®