From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753864AbbFQDYX (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2015 23:24:23 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:42854 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753023AbbFQDYO (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2015 23:24:14 -0400 Message-ID: <1434511453.24642.8.camel@ellerman.id.au> Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the vfs tree From: Michael Ellerman To: Andrew Morton , Al Viro Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fabian Frederick Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:24:13 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10-0ubuntu1~14.10.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andrew, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: fs/ufs/namei.c between commit: a50e4a02ad69 "ufs: don't bother with lock_ufs()/unlock_ufs() for directory access" from the vfs tree and commit: 2ce1efe3965b "fs/ufs: revert "ufs: fix deadlocks introduced by sb mutex merge" from the akpm-current tree. I fixed it up by taking the vfs version and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required). cheers