From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: travis@sgi.com, roland@purestorage.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] mm, x86: Remove region_is_ram() call from ioremap
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 15:44:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1434750245-6304-3-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434750245-6304-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hp.com>
__ioremap_caller() calls region_is_ram() to look up the resource
to check if a target range is RAM, which was added as an additinal
check to improve the lookup performance over page_is_ram() (commit
906e36c5c717 "x86: use optimized ioresource lookup in ioremap
function").
__ioremap_caller() then calls walk_system_ram_range(), which had
replaced page_is_ram() to improve the lookup performance (commit
c81c8a1eeede "x86, ioremap: Speed up check for RAM pages").
Since both functions walk through the resource table, there is
no need to call the two functions. Furthermore, region_is_ram()
has bugs and always returns with -1. This makes
walk_system_ram_range() as the only check being used.
Hence, remove the call to region_is_ram() from __ioremap_caller().
Note, removing the call to region_is_ram() is also necessary
to fix the bugs in region_is_ram(). walk_system_ram_range()
requires RAM ranges aligned by the page size in the resource
table. e820_reserve_setup_data() updates the e820 table by
allocating a separate entry to each data region in setup_data,
which is not page-aligned. Therefore, walk_system_ram_range()
is unable to detect the RAM ranges in setup_data. This
restriction has allowed multiple uses of ioremap() to map
setup_data. Using fixed region_is_ram() will cause these callers
to start failing. After all ioremap to setup_data are converted,
__ioremap_caller() may call region_is_ram() instead.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
---
arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c | 24 ++++++------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
index 56f8af7..928867e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
@@ -89,7 +89,6 @@ static void __iomem *__ioremap_caller(resource_size_t phys_addr,
pgprot_t prot;
int retval;
void __iomem *ret_addr;
- int ram_region;
/* Don't allow wraparound or zero size */
last_addr = phys_addr + size - 1;
@@ -112,26 +111,15 @@ static void __iomem *__ioremap_caller(resource_size_t phys_addr,
/*
* Don't allow anybody to remap normal RAM that we're using..
*/
- /* First check if whole region can be identified as RAM or not */
- ram_region = region_is_ram(phys_addr, size);
- if (ram_region > 0) {
- WARN_ONCE(1, "ioremap on RAM at 0x%lx - 0x%lx\n",
- (unsigned long int)phys_addr,
- (unsigned long int)last_addr);
- return NULL;
- }
-
- /* If could not be identified(-1), check page by page */
- if (ram_region < 0) {
- pfn = phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- last_pfn = last_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- if (walk_system_ram_range(pfn, last_pfn - pfn + 1, NULL,
+ pfn = phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ last_pfn = last_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ if (walk_system_ram_range(pfn, last_pfn - pfn + 1, NULL,
__ioremap_check_ram) == 1) {
- WARN_ONCE(1, "ioremap on RAM at 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
+ WARN_ONCE(1, "ioremap on RAM at 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
phys_addr, last_addr);
- return NULL;
- }
+ return NULL;
}
+
/*
* Mappings have to be page-aligned
*/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-19 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-19 21:44 [PATCH 0/3] mm, x86: Fix ioremap RAM check interfaces Toshi Kani
2015-06-19 21:44 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm, x86: Fix warning in ioremap RAM check Toshi Kani
2015-06-19 21:44 ` Toshi Kani [this message]
2015-06-22 16:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm, x86: Remove region_is_ram() call from ioremap Mike Travis
2015-06-22 17:23 ` Toshi Kani
2015-06-22 18:22 ` Mike Travis
2015-06-22 19:06 ` Toshi Kani
2015-06-23 9:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-23 15:19 ` Toshi Kani
2015-06-23 18:57 ` Mike Travis
2015-06-19 21:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: Fix bugs in region_is_ram() Toshi Kani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1434750245-6304-3-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hp.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@purestorage.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®