From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754428AbbFVQv5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2015 12:51:57 -0400 Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.28]:40292 "EHLO lb2-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752984AbbFVQvs (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2015 12:51:48 -0400 Message-ID: <1434991905.2524.18.camel@tiscali.nl> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Doc: MODULE_SUPPORTED_DEVICE is not implemented From: Paul Bolle To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:51:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20150622103355.2f6939c8@lwn.net> References: <1434723025.2385.144.camel@x220> <20150622103355.2f6939c8@lwn.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.3 (3.16.3-2.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 10:33 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Taking out the documentation reference just makes those even more > mysterious than they already are. I'd favor, instead, either (1) > making the document state explicitly that this macro does nothing, Perhaps the commit explanation was unclear here: did you spot that this is just some random template, not the template that is supposed to document the various module related macros, if such a template even exists. > or (2) a > tree-wide patch simply removing it entirely. See http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1434723861.2385.152.camel@x220 . So that's already being worked on. Thanks, Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/