From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, acme@infradead.org,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel: Kill off intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl for good
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 13:05:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1435140349-32588-3-git-send-email-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435140349-32588-1-git-send-email-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
The x86_lbr_exclusive commit (4807034248be "perf/x86: Mark Intel PT and
LBR/BTS as mutually exclusive") mistakenly moved intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl()
to perf_event.h, while another commit (a46a2300019 "perf: Simplify the
branch stack check") removed it in favor of needs_branch_stack().
This patch gets rid of intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl() for good.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h | 14 --------------
1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
index 06a9ab79d6..0cd854671b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
@@ -794,20 +794,6 @@ static inline int amd_pmu_init(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL
-static inline bool intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl(struct perf_event *event)
-{
- /* user explicitly requested branch sampling */
- if (has_branch_stack(event))
- return true;
-
- /* implicit branch sampling to correct PEBS skid */
- if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_trap && event->attr.precise_ip > 1 &&
- x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format < 2)
- return true;
-
- return false;
-}
-
static inline bool intel_pmu_has_bts(struct perf_event *event)
{
if (event->attr.config == PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS &&
--
2.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-24 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-24 10:05 [PATCH 0/2] perf/x86: Trivial cleanups Alexander Shishkin
2015-06-24 10:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel/bts: Cleanup: drop redundant declarations Alexander Shishkin
2015-08-04 8:53 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/bts: Drop " tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin
2015-06-24 10:05 ` Alexander Shishkin [this message]
2015-08-04 8:53 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Kill off intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl for good tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1435140349-32588-3-git-send-email-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--to=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®