From: kan.liang@intel.com
To: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] perf/x86: fix SLM MSR_OFFCORE_RSP1 valid_mask
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 11:23:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1435170215-5017-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> (raw)
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
AVG_LATENCY(bit 38) is only available on MSR_OFFCORE_RSP0.
So the bit should be removed from RSP1 valid_mask.
Since RSP0 and RSP1 may have different valid_mask, intel_alt_er should
validate the config on the alternate offcore reg before replacing it.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 16 ++++++++++------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index b9826a9..71815cf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -1114,7 +1114,7 @@ static struct extra_reg intel_slm_extra_regs[] __read_mostly =
{
/* must define OFFCORE_RSP_X first, see intel_fixup_er() */
INTEL_UEVENT_EXTRA_REG(0x01b7, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0, 0x768005ffffull, RSP_0),
- INTEL_UEVENT_EXTRA_REG(0x02b7, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1, 0x768005ffffull, RSP_1),
+ INTEL_UEVENT_EXTRA_REG(0x02b7, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1, 0x368005ffffull, RSP_1),
EVENT_EXTRA_END
};
@@ -1699,18 +1699,22 @@ intel_bts_constraints(struct perf_event *event)
return NULL;
}
-static int intel_alt_er(int idx)
+static int intel_alt_er(int idx, u64 config)
{
+ int alt_idx;
if (!(x86_pmu.flags & PMU_FL_HAS_RSP_1))
return idx;
if (idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_0)
- return EXTRA_REG_RSP_1;
+ alt_idx = EXTRA_REG_RSP_1;
if (idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_1)
- return EXTRA_REG_RSP_0;
+ alt_idx = EXTRA_REG_RSP_0;
- return idx;
+ if (config & ~x86_pmu.extra_regs[alt_idx].valid_mask)
+ return idx;
+
+ return alt_idx;
}
static void intel_fixup_er(struct perf_event *event, int idx)
@@ -1799,7 +1803,7 @@ again:
*/
c = NULL;
} else {
- idx = intel_alt_er(idx);
+ idx = intel_alt_er(idx, reg->config);
if (idx != reg->idx) {
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&era->lock, flags);
goto again;
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2015-06-25 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-24 18:23 kan.liang [this message]
2015-08-04 8:53 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Fix " tip-bot for Kan Liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1435170215-5017-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome