mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ring_buffer: Initialize completions statically in the benchmark
Date: Thu,  9 Jul 2015 17:09:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436454561-29925-2-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436454561-29925-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com>

It looks strange to initialize the completions repeatedly.

This patch uses static initialization. It simplifies the code
and even helps to get rid of two memory barriers.

Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 12 ++----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
index a1503a027ee2..ccb1a0b95f64 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ struct rb_page {
 static int wakeup_interval = 100;
 
 static int reader_finish;
-static struct completion read_start;
-static struct completion read_done;
+static DECLARE_COMPLETION(read_start);
+static DECLARE_COMPLETION(read_done);
 
 static struct ring_buffer *buffer;
 static struct task_struct *producer;
@@ -270,11 +270,6 @@ static void ring_buffer_producer(void)
 	trace_printk("End ring buffer hammer\n");
 
 	if (consumer) {
-		/* Init both completions here to avoid races */
-		init_completion(&read_start);
-		init_completion(&read_done);
-		/* the completions must be visible before the finish var */
-		smp_wmb();
 		reader_finish = 1;
 		/* finish var visible before waking up the consumer */
 		smp_wmb();
@@ -389,13 +384,10 @@ static int ring_buffer_consumer_thread(void *arg)
 
 static int ring_buffer_producer_thread(void *arg)
 {
-	init_completion(&read_start);
-
 	while (!kthread_should_stop() && !kill_test) {
 		ring_buffer_reset(buffer);
 
 		if (consumer) {
-			smp_wmb();
 			wake_up_process(consumer);
 			wait_for_completion(&read_start);
 		}
-- 
1.8.5.6


  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-09 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-09 15:09 [PATCH 0/2] Some cleanup of ring buffer benchmark Petr Mladek
2015-07-09 15:09 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2015-07-09 15:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] ring_buffer: Fix more races when terminating the producer in the benchmark Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1436454561-29925-2-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®