mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Roy Pledge <Roy.Pledge@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, scottwood@freescale.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] soc/fsl: Introduce the DPAA BMan portal driver
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:32:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436535163.20619.216.camel@tiscali.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436473322-21247-4-git-send-email-Roy.Pledge@freescale.com>

On do, 2015-07-09 at 16:21 -0400, Roy Pledge wrote:
> --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/Kconfig

> +config FSL_DPA_PIRQ_FAST
> +	bool
> +	default y

First used in 04/11.

> +config FSL_DPA_PIRQ_SLOW
> +	bool
> +	default y
> +
> +config FSL_DPA_PORTAL_SHARE
> +	bool
> +	default y

As in 02/11: these three symbols function as aliases for FSL_DPA. Why
are they needed? 

>  config FSL_BMAN
>  	tristate "BMan device management"
>  	default n
>  	help
>  		FSL DPAA BMan driver
>  
> +config FSL_BMAN_PORTAL
> +	tristate "BMan portal(s)"
> +	default n
> +	help
> +		FSL BMan portal driver

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman_api.c

> +struct bman_portal {
> +	[...]
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_DPA_CAN_WAIT_SYNC

This check will always evaluate to true, right? (I'll only report this
once.)

> +	struct bman_pool *rcri_owned; /* only 1 release WAIT_SYNC at 
> a time */
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_DPA_PORTAL_SHARE

Ditto.

> +	raw_spinlock_t sharing_lock; /* only used if is_shared */
> +	int is_shared;
> +	struct bman_portal *sharing_redirect;
> +#endif
> +	[...]
> +};

> +const struct bman_portal_config *bman_get_portal_config(void)
> +{
> +	[...]
> +}

I couldn't find callers of this function.

> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bman_get_portal_config);

Nor users of this export, obviously.

> +
> +u32 bman_irqsource_get(void)
> +{
> +	[...]
> +}

Ditto.

> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bman_irqsource_get);

Ditto.

> +int bman_p_irqsource_add(struct bman_portal *p, __maybe_unused u32 bits)
> +{
> +	[...]
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bman_p_irqsource_add);

There seem to be no users of this export.

> +int bman_irqsource_add(__maybe_unused u32 bits)
> +{
> +	[...]
> +}

Unused.

> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bman_irqsource_add);

Ditto.

> +int bman_irqsource_remove(u32 bits)
> +{
> +	[...]
> +}

Ditto. 

> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bman_irqsource_remove);

Ditto.

> +u32 bman_poll_slow(void)
> +{
> +	[...]
> +}

Ditto.

> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bman_poll_slow);

Ditto.

> +void bman_poll(void)
> +{
> +	[...]
> +}

Ditto.

> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bman_poll);

Ditto.

> +static inline struct bm_rcr_entry *try_rel_start(struct bman_portal **p,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_DPA_CAN_WAIT

Always true, right?

> +					__maybe_unused struct bman_pool *pool,
> +#endif
> +					__maybe_unused unsigned long *irqflags,
> +					__maybe_unused u32 flags)

And this is a, well, novel way to declare a function.

> +{
> +	[...]
> +}

> +int bman_flush_stockpile(struct bman_pool *pool, u32 flags)
> +{
> +	[...]
> +}

Unused function.

> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bman_flush_stockpile);

So unused export too.

> +#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_BMAN
> +u32 bman_query_free_buffers(struct bman_pool *pool)
> +{
> +	return bm_pool_free_buffers(pool->params.bpid);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bman_query_free_buffers);
> +
> +int bman_update_pool_thresholds(struct bman_pool *pool, const u32 *thresholds)
> +{
> +	u32 bpid;
> +
> +	bpid = bman_get_params(pool)->bpid;
> +
> +	return bm_pool_set(bpid, thresholds);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bman_update_pool_thresholds);

More of the same.

> +#endif

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman_portal.c
> 
> +module_driver(bman_portal_driver,
> +	       bman_portal_driver_register, platform_driver_unregister);

No MODULE_LICENSE() here, nor in the other files that make up this
module. So loading this module will trigger a warning and taint the
kernel.

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman_utils.c

> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bman_alloc_bpid_range);

Unused export.

> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bman_release_bpid_range);

Ditto.

> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bman_seed_bpid_range);

Ditto.

> +int bman_reserve_bpid_range(u32 bpid, u32 count)
> +{
> +	return dpaa_resource_reserve(&bpalloc, bpid, count);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bman_reserve_bpid_range);

Because bman_reserve_bpid() is unused, see below, this function and this
export are unused too.

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/dpaa_resource.c
> 
> +#if defined(CONFIG_FSL_BMAN_PORTAL) || defined(CONFIG_FSL_BMAN_PORTAL_MODULE)

#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_BMAN_PORTAL)

> +#ifdef DPAA_RESOURCE_DEBUG

Never defined. So DUMP() is dead code.

> --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/dpaa_sys.h
> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/dpaa_sys.h
> 
> +#define CONFIG_TRY_BETTER_MEMCPY

Please replace the CONFIG_ prefix with something else.

> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRY_BETTER_MEMCPY

This will always be true, right?

> [...]
> +#else
> +#define copy_words memcpy
> +#define copy_shorts memcpy
> +#define copy_bytes memcpy
> +#endif

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/soc/fsl/bman.h

> +static inline int bman_reserve_bpid(u32 bpid)
> +{
> +	return bman_reserve_bpid_range(bpid, 1);
> +}

Unused.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-10 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-09 20:21 [PATCH 00/11] Freescale DPAA QBMan Drivers Roy Pledge
2015-07-09 20:21 ` [PATCH 01/11] powerpc: re-add devm_ioremap_prot() Roy Pledge
2015-07-09 20:21 ` [PATCH 02/11] soc/fsl: Introduce DPAA BMan device management driver Roy Pledge
2015-07-10  8:38   ` Paul Bolle
2015-07-10 17:31     ` Scott Wood
2015-07-10 18:29       ` Roy Pledge
2015-07-10 18:50         ` Scott Wood
2015-07-10 11:36   ` Paul Bolle
2015-07-10 17:33     ` Scott Wood
2015-07-10 20:57       ` Roy Pledge
2015-07-10 21:12         ` Scott Wood
2015-07-09 20:21 ` [PATCH 03/11] soc/fsl: Introduce the DPAA BMan portal driver Roy Pledge
2015-07-10 13:32   ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2015-07-10 15:19     ` Roy Pledge
2015-07-10 16:47       ` Paul Bolle
2015-07-09 20:21 ` [PATCH 04/11] soc/fsl: Introduce drivers for the DPAA QMan Roy Pledge
2015-07-11 10:34   ` Paul Bolle
2015-07-09 20:21 ` [PATCH 05/11] soc/bman: Add self-tester for BMan driver Roy Pledge
2015-07-09 20:21 ` [PATCH 06/11] soc/qman: Add self-tester for QMan driver Roy Pledge
2015-07-09 20:21 ` [PATCH 07/11] soc/bman: Add debugfs support for the BMan driver Roy Pledge
2015-07-09 20:21 ` [PATCH 08/11] soc/qman: Add debugfs support for the QMan driver Roy Pledge
2015-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH 09/11] soc/bman: Add HOTPLUG_CPU support to the BMan driver Roy Pledge
2015-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH 10/11] soc/qman: Add HOTPLUG_CPU support to the QMan driver Roy Pledge
2015-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH 11/11] soc/qman: add qman_delete_cgr_safe() Roy Pledge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1436535163.20619.216.camel@tiscali.nl \
    --to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=Roy.Pledge@freescale.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®